![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Will continue taking data in spare time. H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
and yes thats a good way to go about it bc if clickies indeed can randomly roll to a more powerful counter............ then possibly the higher lvl buffs (50+) should be rolling higher numbers more consistently to off set the random chance you have a clicky with very high buff power counter | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Recently discovered Usenet - also recently discovered a lot of information on old EQ aspects (2001 era) via Google Groups' Usenet Archive.
See some talk about top down dispells vs "random" order here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se...A/ZMlANUFAImkJ I'll post more as I find it.
__________________
Realtime auction logger: http://ahungry.com/eqauctions/
| ||
|
Last edited by tristantio; 12-09-2014 at 01:43 PM..
|
|
||
|
#4
|
|||
|
seems people on that link you posted felt dragon AE dispell was always the top bottom type dispell while cancel magic type can be more random like Haynar created
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Yea, I think the current system is pretty accurate (so far I'm unable to find anything about clickies being limited to a smaller charge #).
This is a much better post about dispel order: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se...U/CdfXU5UfNcgJ The TLDR:
Edit: Not sure why the auto link didn't work, fixing.
__________________
Realtime auction logger: http://ahungry.com/eqauctions/
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
I have the feeling it is not an equal chance for getting higher random counters. The eqlive RNG is very streaky though. It would be cool if we could reproduce that streakiness. For a more classic experience that is.
H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
TLDR
A) When did this get changed on the server and why specifically? Surely there's a reason for amendments and patches - that information should help us in this case. B) Removal of buffs from the wrong slots. | ||
|
Last edited by Toodles; 12-10-2014 at 11:16 AM..
|
|
||
|
#8
|
|||
|
You have to keep in mind when testing dispels on Live, they have been revamped a few times.
One of them made dispels remove all beneficial effects before they could remove detrimentals. Think another one completely randomized the slots removed. Testing on live isn't the best bet for dispel mechanics. What I suggested earlier would create a more classic dispel situation. Clickies always 1 roll NPCs have less desire to cast dispels (instead of casting 5+ in a fight).
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
As if camping the corrupted shaman in Lake Rathe wasn't annoying enough, they love to dispell, and it lands every time. Had to keep proper junk buffs for all 20 hours
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|