THIS SERVER NEEDS MORE GM'S

[Smedy]

sapphiay may be the most brilliant troll ever, had me for awhile in the beginning dog, cast is that u? who could conjure up such a brilliant troll needs an award

[Farzo]

The problem with picking a GM from the player base is they are innately biased from the onset and would make all the tin foil hatters go bezerk with theories.

The problem with not picking a player based GM is he(or she) won't have the understanding of what's going on and make bad calls (call in the tin foilers after said bad calls).

Now: If you got an unassociated gm who never showed his face and was an arsehole fgt and banned said known rule breakers the moment they break rules I.e: rmt = goodbye; 1 month suspension across all accounts for training; boxing= goodbye; etc etc

A gm who spends x amount of time weekly/montly looking at the "known" fgts on server I.e once a month checks Sektorz for rmt (coz guy is doing it atm an everyone knows it Mr 400kpp wtb list/vibrating gloves) I.e checks lite/bstagor/x-y-z person for boxing buff toons etc. -Disclaimer: All the above mentioned persons are just an example of suspect people and their crimes - You'd soon find that more then not people will fall in to line a bit better.

You cannot beat a bunch of fgt nerds with a tea party scheme; you have to hit them where it hurts and that is with perma bans and loooooong suspensions.

Then you have people like Aussie/Durebael etc doing CSR work..... Problems solved.

[derpcake]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

NOT JOKING
STOP MAKING RED STAFF QUIT (see i can caps lock too)

oh wait, i forgot. the red community isn't the problem tho right? i'm sure the staff just sits up on their ivory thrones, making poor decisions to ruin the server, while cackling gleefully about the r99 petition response times.

theres a reason every red staff member has quit or moved over to blue, and spoiler alert, it's not because of the staff.

we'll get a new red guide, and in 3-4 months, you'll have run him off too.

<3
Sirks

Maybe if you actually banned some of these toxic people permanently, the server would be more enjoyable to players & staff?

Atm it sounds like you are saying "server too toxic, no staff for u", which is pretty funny given the extremely soft-handed approach taken.

[Clark]

Originally Posted by Pitborn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SZ rule set pls. ( But ban confirmed haxers )

[Widan]

How hard is it to just have a GM go to r99pvp.com and suspend everyone who is obviously bind camping other players for long periods of time? I mean it has the time stamps there for you already, you hardly have to do any work.

[Widan]

I mean look at this: http://r99pvp.com/showplayer.php?p=Candie

It would take maybe one minute to ban this player

[quido]

Bind camping isn't even technically against the rules. It is also easily deterred with an LNS call, and if this is violated, it's easy to get the violator banned. I'd rather see Chopper get banned for screen-dragging.

[Widan]

Actually you are wrong. It clearly says it is against the rules twice in the stickied rules thread:

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=148787

Killing someone over and over again while at his or her bind-point or while they are in the process of looting and scooting is illegal and may result in disciplinary action taken against your account.

.................

Excessive bind point camping (killing a player over and over at their bind point) is against the rules.

[Bazia]

GMs still been helping out, even Eunomia comes over to help with stuff from time 2 time

[quido]

Rule seems vague and unclear - how many times is Ok before it's considered "over and over?" If people want a free pass, they should simply call LNS.