Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 08-28-2014, 10:54 AM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
wait, did they violate the 2 tracker rule or not? you call anthrax a liar but you're clearly attempting to slant facts to fit the TMO agenda. hypocrite.
Takens trackers + BDAs trackers = more than two. Taken was all dying, however, and they had no part in consciously breaking the rule themselves. They didn't ask BDA to do what they did, supposedly. Therefore BDA violated the rule by running in and helping, when they knew they had at least one tracker of their own. Try and keep up with the conversation if you're going to call people names.
  #42  
Old 08-28-2014, 10:57 AM
Juevento Juevento is offline
Sarnak

Juevento's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
regening*

Spell check is garbage.
Spelling the word correctly still doesn't make your lie a truthful statement.
__________________
Juevento - 60 Rogue <BDA>

Juevento - Druid <Free Agent>
  #43  
Old 08-28-2014, 10:59 AM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ask them why they would not submit a fraps of the incident.

TMO always has a fraps.
I had a fraps of this myself. Probably at least 5 other people did. I never uploaded it because it showed nothing relevant. How would a video of the incident have helped the situation? It would have showed Taken engaging, and then BDA running in and killing it at around 30%. Everyone knew what happened, and the GMs have the logs of when BDA engaged. No fraps was needed.
  #44  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:01 AM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How would a video of the incident have helped the situation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It would have showed Taken engaging, and then BDA running in and killing it at around 30%.
so then it doesn't show taken's force dying and naggy summoning their remaining members to finish them off?
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #45  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:01 AM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juevento [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Spelling the word correctly still doesn't make your lie a truthful statement.
If Taken wasn't wiping, then why did BDA run in and kill it? It was clearly over.
  #46  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:02 AM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
so then it doesn't show taken's force dying and naggy summoning their remaining members to finish them off?
That's all irrelevant to the petition. All that was needed was proof of BDA helping kill a naggy they they are not allowed to engage.
  #47  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:04 AM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Takens trackers + BDAs trackers = more than two.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They didn't ask BDA to do what they did
if there's no collusion, it's not taken + bda trackers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Therefore BDA violated the rule by running in and helping, when they knew they had at least one tracker of their own.
what rule? so you're making up rules that two separate raid forces cannot have their own trackers? or is it that they count as the same raid force if they're both competing against TMO?
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #48  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:06 AM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's all irrelevant to the petition. All that was needed was proof of BDA helping kill a naggy they they are not allowed to engage.
sorry, you're wrong here. helping to kill a naggy is not against the rules. that's what TMO has been doing wrong all along here. try to help other players for once instead of indiscriminately shitting all over them.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #49  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:06 AM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if there's no collusion, it's not taken + bda trackers.



what rule? so you're making up rules that two separate raid forces cannot have their own trackers? or is it that they count as the same raid force if they're both competing against TMO?
The same raid force cannot track with more than two trackers. When FE/IB raided together, they had to abide by those same rules. Taken and BDA became one raid force when BDA jumped on Taken's Nagafen. BDA and Taken killed that dragon together. It's not difficult to understand.
  #50  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:08 AM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

To clarify further. If BDA didn't have a tracker of their own, they could have helped Taken kill Naggy and it would have been fine. There is no rule against helping other guilds. There is a rule about numbers of trackers allowed past the zone in. Which is the issue here.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.