![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
you guys keep saying there are a "serious lack of hybrids" - do you have any numbers to back this up? try doing some /who all count queries at different times of day. i personally haven't noticed a noticeable difference in the amount of hybrid vs purebred toons.
i HAVE noticed that hybrid toons tend to be more twinked, but that makes sense, and isn't necessarily unclassic | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
exp penalties were clearly marked as warnings in both of my strategy guides. strategy guides are classic. so are wikis.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://wiki.project1999.com/Game_Mec...for_Experience
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
even if there were a much larger proportion of hybrids on classic servers, what does that show? you can speculate all you want about the knowledge of hybrid exp solo/group penatlies being responsible for the low proportion of hybrids here, but it doesn't help.
i think a more likely reason is directly tied to the argument that hybrids suck up more exp. people want more efficient leveling, and hybrids just aren't that efficient, even if the exp penalty was gone. if you want a hyper-efficient leveling group, you have cleric, enchanter, monk, warrior, rogue, rogue, or something similar. why the hell would you add the miserable ranger dps or the half-assed damage mitigation of paladins/sks? the utility that hybrids brings is better and paired with much more useful group function in the purebred classes. now that this "knowledge" is more commonplace, is it any wonder why people choose to play hybrids less here, or why groups would choose a warrior over an SK, all other considerations being equal? tl;dr stop trying to make this server EZ mode EQ. shit's fucking classic, and if you don't like it, you can git | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
Taking away an Exp penalty to a class is not making the server easy mode. Sorry I don't have a crayon to break this down anymore than I already have. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
As a 46 ranger, I laugh at threads like this. I've literally never had to wait more than 15 minutes to find/create a group in CoM throughout the last 6 levels. I think the only people that have denied me would have denied any dps from their 3-4 man groups and have only gotten maybe one comment because I'm a ranger. The people who cry that they can't find groups are probably just miserably annoying, stiffs or suck at their role.
Let the people who are scared off by the penalty stick to their rogues, shamans, chanters and clerics. More raid loot for me. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|