WTB A title for Bob

[Bubbles]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Keep 'em comin guys. These textbook logical fallacies could be effortlessly disarmed by a first-year Philosophy undergrad at Collin's College. Don't worry, I'll still be here when you get your nut up and can come up with an actual substantive argument for giving Bob a title.

As long as you realize we are using you solely for the purpose of free bumps. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Anaiyah]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Keep 'em comin guys. These textbook logical fallacies could be effortlessly disarmed by a first-year Philosophy undergrad at Collin's College. Don't worry, I'll still be here when you get your nut up and can come up with an actual substantive argument for giving Bob a title.

Keep 'em coming Purist. These posts could be effortlessly disarmed by a 5th grader who understands what the purpose of a video game is.

[purist]

Originally Posted by Bubbles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As long as you realize we are using you solely for the purpose of free bumps. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

[Tseng]

lol @ how fucking mad purist is right now

He ain't sleeping tonight over this shit.

[Yoite]

why don't we just power lvl him to 20?

[purist]

Since you guys are just rehashing shit I already tore down, allow me to remind you of your "arguments" that I've already showed you are weak for future reference.

Logical fallacies:

-"lolumad"
-"how does it affect you?" (AKA; the "lol, it will make you mad argument")
-"lol, we got more votes."

Other invalid arguments:

-"It's a 'funny idea' that's 'pretty awesome.'"
-"He's dedicated."
-"He's the first."

Anything else?

[Anaiyah]

A Challenger Appears...!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[internalprime8]

I think Purist wants a title

[citizen1080]

Originally Posted by Anaiyah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A Challenger Appears...!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is pure awesome...

On a side note...someone start a WTB: Purist a title thread

whoever gets the least amount of yes votes has to castrate himself? or maybe just say sorry...dunno just a thought...

[stormiejs]

Originally Posted by internalprime8 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think Purist wants a title

I think he wants the server to himself because clearly he is the only one that plays on it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Keep 'em comin guys. These textbook logical fallacies could be effortlessly disarmed by a first-year Philosophy undergrad at Collin's College. Don't worry, I'll still be here when you get your nut up and can come up with an actual substantive argument for giving Bob a title.

You still haven't provided us with any reason as to why a title should only be given out for server first pve kills. Are you suggesting that people should not get titles for a botb, tot, or for GM events in which more than one person was involved? All I see you doing here is feeding and baiting trolls.

Bob is a modest person, provides a great service, and is a lot of fun; if anything this thread was just a tribute to him because it's highly likely that he won't get a title even without you whining about it for 4 pages.

We may as well move this to r&f thanks to Purist.