Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2013, 05:02 PM
Furniture Furniture is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Location: ny
Posts: 442
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
okay, how many times in classic did you see sub 40s with their epics? not counting deleveled rogues on Rallos. I cant remember any. Now look at p99. just goto ec tunnel and youll see alot.

i seriously think something aint right.


I agree 100%, but I think this is part of the problem that comes from being in kunark/classic way longer then we did back then rather then making too many rich folk and epic drops being dropped much more in total then they did back in the day due to being in classic too long. Both of these issues drastically create an unclassic environment that we didnt have back in the day. I understand the reluctance to change a classic mechanic to something unclassic and I usually support that. This approach however is flawed when i comes to issues like what i just mentioned where the issue did not exist in classic. A change like the epic mq idea may not take the classic approach verbatim, but it does in fact keep one aspect of classic that is lost on the server now.

Its a trade off that is unfortunately a matter of opinion for the devs to decide. Should they make epics harder to get then in classic by eliminating their mq (assuming mq in classic existed) to keep the legitimacy of epics or should they allow epics to come easier then they did back in the day using the "as close to classic as possible approach"?

I sympathize for the devs here as it must be stressful to have to make such decisions when there is solid reasons on both sides for p99 dilemmas such as these. It would be cool if on undecided issues where both options are unclassic (like this epic mq issue) for a community vote to decide the result.
  #2  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:35 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Sure it's not right, but on classic people were not as aware of what they could do.

Rogue epic required level 50 for the hand in. There is good evidence in the bug thread that supports this.

The issue is some class epics were MQable at level 1 and others were not.

With the relative easy of the rogue one, and people not being able to do a hand in <50, I can see most people assuming that was the case for all classes and not willing to risk getting their shit eaten.
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #3  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:38 PM
BillyCranston BillyCranston is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sure it's not right, but on classic people were not as aware of what they could do.

Rogue epic required level 50 for the hand in. There is good evidence in the bug thread that supports this.

The issue is some class epics were MQable at level 1 and others were not.

With the relative easy of the rogue one, and people not being able to do a hand in <50, I can see most people assuming that was the case for all classes and not willing to risk getting their shit eaten.
This just speaks to the fact that every Epic should have been 46-50 minimum to complete. Most of them require items from the planes or a quest in the planes. So like everything else Verant did, some dickhead probably forgot to flag the quests, and since, like you said, no one risked it on live... The issue never really came up, and never forced the coding.

But we won't do that here right? Because it certainly wouldn't make sense to have patches specific to the server and the server's playerbase. Oh wait... that's been done numerous times before!

MQing epics is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. A 40 rogue should not have their fucking epic and be backstabbing for 400 damage.
  #4  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:41 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyCranston [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This just speaks to the fact that every Epic should have been 46-50 minimum to complete. Most of them require items from the planes or a quest in the planes. So like everything else Verant did, some dickhead probably forgot to flag the quests, and since, like you said, no one risked it on live... The issue never really came up, and never forced the coding.

But we won't do that here right? Because it certainly wouldn't make sense to have patches specific to the server and the server's playerbase. Oh wait... that's been done numerous times before!

MQing epics is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. A 40 rogue should not have their fucking epic and be backstabbing for 400 damage.
I'm not against you.

Personally I wouldn't mind having a level 50 turn in requirement on all epics, MQ'd or not. Probably the most simple solution IMO.
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #5  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:41 PM
JayN JayN is offline
Fire Giant

JayN's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 889
Default

demand = supply

gtfo please QQ

go farm some plat and buy one or do it the hard way and bg your asshat'ed guilds.
  #6  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:42 PM
jpetrick jpetrick is offline
Fire Giant

jpetrick's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 766
Default

Epics should be 46+ and not MQable. Fuck it if it's not classic. The amount of greed here is stupid. I know people who have had to roll on their epic quest items in groups; that is unreal. On live that would never have happened.
__________________
Elzhi <Indignation>
  #7  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:45 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpetrick [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Epics should be 46+ and not MQable. Fuck it if it's not classic. The amount of greed here is stupid. I know people who have had to roll on their epic quest items in groups; that is unreal. On live that would never have happened.
wow
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #8  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:53 PM
Itap Itap is offline
Planar Protector

Itap's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Permafrost
Posts: 1,953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpetrick [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Epics should be 46+ and not MQable. Fuck it if it's not classic. The amount of greed here is stupid. I know people who have had to roll on their epic quest items in groups; that is unreal. On live that would never have happened.
This is the norm on this server. Monk in need of the chardok pipe? ROLL LIKE THE REST OF US FAGGOT
__________________
Lootenant Dan <Hierophant>
  #9  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:54 PM
Itap Itap is offline
Planar Protector

Itap's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Permafrost
Posts: 1,953
Default

Where I played, on CT, if it was class specific or an upgrade for you, its yours. Hence the "need before greed".
__________________
Lootenant Dan <Hierophant>
  #10  
Old 11-21-2013, 04:54 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,187
Default

just emailed Brad asking about this. most pathetic thing ive done in related to forumquest. if he replies (which I doubt) I will post what he said on here.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.