PSA: Veeshan's Peak

[Greegon]

wasnt nihilum already told not to do this? should suspend them for 2 weeks only fair

[s1ckness]

blue99 has 2 deal with trains with 20xs the population, why cant u ? already farming a dead server.. tbh i think u guys would have more fun on blue99 , there is competition atleast

[Bazia]

thought u were a nihi nutswinger chopchop

[Pudge]

don't forget to load up MQ2 after you zone into VP elderan, it's a non-CSR zone

[Dullah]

First, training was never permitted in VP. No-csr never negated the play nice policy. I can understand when there are 100s of players unable to pvp each other and so much drama over VP on the blue server how you guys can take the standoffish policy of allowing training, but on a pvp server theres no excuse for allowing players to train. If you want to contest, you do so with pvp, not using pathing exploits, invulnerability and res boxes to train.

Second, if the issue is fighting on the ledge, should we then not be able to fight below but utilize this area to avoid other players training? I say this knowing that dragons can be killed 100% legitimately from this location, but nevertheless, I don't see the reason to restrict player presence here if they are avoiding fighting from the ledge.

[Elderan]

Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

trains are not an exploit

abusing Z-axis ledges is an exploit

try and wrap your brain around it one more time i think you can do it

Explain in detail how the z-axis is exploited there..

[Bazia]

if you need more detail read the 700 blue threads on this subject

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Dullah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

First, training was never permitted in VP. No-csr never negated the play nice policy. I can understand when there are 100s of players unable to pvp each other and so much drama over VP on the blue server how you guys can take the standoffish policy of allowing training, but on a pvp server theres no excuse for allowing players to train. If you want to contest, you do so with pvp, not using pathing exploits, invulnerability and res boxes to train.

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You seem to think that our "No CSR" rule is related to SOE's "No Guide" Rule (Maybe also called "No CSR"). The live version was a list of zones that guides could not enter due to the possibility that they may unintentionally interfere with the players.

This is not the same. Our "No CSR" Rule was not put in place to mimick live's, it is a separate rule in place for separate reasons. Therefor, your comparison to any relative eqlive policy is invalid.

Disclaimer: This post was made to correct the misconception that the rule was based on an eqlive policy, which is not. I am not posting to say that we would or wouldn't consider removing our "No CSR" policy, which may or may not be up for reconsideration.

[Stinkum]

pretty simple. just stay off the ledge, if you don't like it, no one is twisting your elbow forcing you to play on this free, private, volunteer server.

it's like a homeless person going to a free soup kitchen and then demanding a 40-page research project on the reasons the soup of the day is chicken noodle instead of tomato

[pharmakos]

Originally Posted by Stinkum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it's like a homeless person going to a free soup kitchen and then demanding a 40-page research project on the reasons the soup of the day is chicken noodle instead of tomato

but what if they're vegetarian? =p