Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-04-2013, 02:36 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So is banning people for mq / cheating

-- this was @ HB's comment for cheating/mq being classic. This thread is going to quickly speed through Dumb Valley.
my comment was boxing, something never illegal on EQ Live, was classic.
  #2  
Old 09-04-2013, 02:32 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,186
Default

if everyone is for it i guess its the right thing to do. i just dont see myself playing. gonna leave this discussion before HB starts posting pictures of my kid. peace.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #3  
Old 09-04-2013, 02:35 PM
Sektor Sektor is offline
Planar Protector

Sektor's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Philly
Posts: 3,180
Send a message via AIM to Sektor
Default

HB looking like a big douche talking about Sams RL. Pretty sure he's one of the few people posting Jew pictures.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pumped View Post
sektor swims with dolphins, get on his fucking level.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuffpuppy View Post
Saint Sektor cleansing the server of sick humans. This guy deserves VIP / Contributor status.
  #4  
Old 09-04-2013, 02:38 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

So is having to pay for each..

Heartbrand

fucking

I'm out for the day, ya'll have a blessed one
  #5  
Old 09-04-2013, 02:39 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So is having to pay for each..

Heartbrand

fucking

I'm out for the day, ya'll have a blessed one
That's a ridiculous analogy. If you want to go down that road then everyone banned should have to pony up another $29.99 to fire up a new account, we should have 14.4k modems, etc. Come on man keep it legit the discussion, but "classic" isn't something you can use against boxing.
  #6  
Old 09-04-2013, 03:40 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,657
Default

Boxing isn't even open for discussion as far as I'm concerned. Rogean feels the same way.

I did want to respond to the following:

Quote:
Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"classic" isn't something you can use against boxing.
Considering like 1% of the total population from 1999-2001 multi-boxed, I believe 'it' certainly is something you can use against boxing. Yeah I'm ballparking those statistics, and if you research it, you'll come to a similar conclusion. In 1999, 0.1%, in 2000, 0.5%, and in 2001, about 1%. By 2002, broadband began fueling the majority of the internet in the US, and things drastically changed... including the bad parts of eq I personally do not want to replicate.

EQwindows was not even working until late 2000. Meaning in addition to the monthly subscription fee, you also needed a dedicated box for each instance the client because you couldn't do it on the same machine.
  #7  
Old 09-04-2013, 03:56 PM
Naikon Naikon is offline
Orc

Naikon's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Boxing isn't even open for discussion as far as I'm concerned. Rogean feels the same way.

I did want to respond to the following:



Considering like 1% of the total population from 1999-2001 multi-boxed, I believe 'it' certainly is something you can use against boxing. Yeah I'm ballparking those statistics, and if you research it, you'll come to a similar conclusion. In 1999, 0.1%, in 2000, 0.5%, and in 2001, about 1%. By 2002, broadband began fueling the majority of the internet in the US, and things drastically changed... including the bad parts of eq I personally do not want to replicate.

EQwindows was not even working until late 2000. Meaning in addition to the monthly subscription fee, you also needed a dedicated box for each instance the client because you couldn't do it on the same machine.
Thanks for posting. A couple years ago there was no hope for a red99, after that there was no consideration for yellow text or global ooc. Then there was no way a teams pvp server would be created. Now here we are, so it never hurts to bring it up.
  #8  
Old 09-04-2013, 04:02 PM
HippoNipple HippoNipple is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naikon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Thanks for posting. A couple years ago there was no hope for a red99, after that there was no consideration for yellow text or global ooc. Then there was no way a teams pvp server would be created. Now here we are, so it never hurts to bring it up.
The trolls eventually wear you down. There is no beating the basement dwelling trolls of project 1999 and the server will be the way we want it!! MUAHAHAHAHAH
  #9  
Old 09-04-2013, 08:06 PM
Dacuk Dacuk is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Boxing isn't even open for discussion as far as I'm concerned. Rogean feels the same way.
Nilbog, I'm sure you've mentioned it before, but what do you see as the major cons against boxing?

Personally, I think to the many hours I've spent lfg on my sk or an hour+ waiting for a port, and realize how much more enjoyable some of my time on this server could have been had boxing been enabled.
  #10  
Old 09-05-2013, 01:20 PM
Lu|z Sect Lu|z Sect is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 152
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.