goodbye 1st. ammendment

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by smokemon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hasbinbad just curious what you believe. Do you believe that our millions of simultaneous chemical reactions all firing in synchronicity in our bodies that keep us alive everyday are just a jargon of randomly coincidentally events that lead to us right here arguing across pixels?

There are really two questions here that you try to cleverly couch as one.

I don't think so. Homie don't play that.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do I "believe" in evolution as the mechanism for the development of life on earth? Yes. And that's the view I will continue to hold until better evidence is presented.

The second questions is whether or not I think "it" all happened by random chance (the god question). My answer to that is that I don't "believe" anything about that. I've embraced my ignorance on the topic. You should embrace yours.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Nocturne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ya Christianity sure is evil man. You're totally right. It's ok though I know it's just because of your blatant ignorance and your evil nature that you are blinded from the truth. Hopefully you can pull your head out of your ass before you are thrown into the lake of fire.

As for arguing with people like you and Rhambuk. If you are seriously too dumb to realize that something like DNA could never be the product of random chance then there is literally no point in even debating with you. Nobody with such an inability to grasp reason can possibly be reasoned with. The change will have to come from within yourself first.

This quote is especially apt when applied to you.

"I like your christ. I do not like your christians. Your christians are so unlike your christ."
-Bapu

[smokemon]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do I "believe" in evolution as the mechanism for the development of life on earth? Yes. And that's the view I will continue to hold until better evidence is presented.

Wait, what evidence are you referring to in the first place? The fact that since the age of 5 or 6 we've been indoctrinated to believe in our public education system that EVOLUTION is and always will be the only way? Or is it the scientific THEORIES purported but never substantiated by any verifiable evidence of linking us to monkeys or even linking us to any other early hominids?

The second questions is whether or not I think "it" all happened by random chance (the god question). My answer to that is that I don't "believe" anything about that. I've embraced my ignorance on the topic. You should embrace yours.

Why embrace ignorance, when truth is right before your eyes.

Yeshua said it himself. I am the way, the truth and the light.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by smokemon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

THEORIES purported but never substantiated by any verifiable evidence

I'm just going to leave this here. You obviously have absolutely no idea what the words you're using mean.

[smokemon]

............LOL k. I win you lose.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Tippett [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

smoke weed y'all

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[smokemon]

How bout I fucker her mom and then legalize weed?

[Rellapse10]

Originally Posted by smokemon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How bout I fucker her mom and then legalize weed?

[Splorf22]

Originally Posted by smokemon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a302967.pdf

read.

I only read the abstract, and I already know that the paper does not say what you think it says. What your paper claims is that genetic algorithms are not better than other optimization algorithms like, say, simulated annealing. Now I am already suspicious of this - if you think about, this kind of thing is very difficult to prove empirically - but I can't be bothered to read the paper deeply enough to look at their methodology.

But it doesn't matter because you totally missed the point. ANY optimization algorithm is GREAT at finding local maxima and minima. The problem is whether you are at a global max/min. Species make perfect sense if you think of each one as a local maximum.

[Zadrian]

Before anyone continues any further. Please learn the difference between theory and scientific theory.

Thanks, continue on.