pras nilbog

[Ephi]

Originally Posted by Reddi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure they listed the names from 2011 MQ sweep

Oh, so lets do it because we did it last time.

Name and shame does nothing but gives the trolls more to do when they should be:

1) Outside
2) In school
3) At work
4) Not here

[heartbrand]

I've seen basically every1 on so far post ban anyway so chances are if any1 got banned on red it's a bunch of non-factors no1 ever heard of

[Reddi]

Originally Posted by Ephi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh, so lets do it because we did it last time.

Name and shame does nothing but gives the trolls more to do when they should be:

1) Outside
2) In school
3) At work
4) Not here

Why do u hate me so much every interaction with you is a condescending negative one.

[quido]

1) There was just a tornado here
2) No class today!
3) No work today!
4) You love us

Having done it before is not a good reason for doing it again. However, enabling the community to identify and appropriately ostracize violators is not just feeding the trolls (though it is that too) - it is an additional (though clearly not necessary) means of further promoting server integrity. Why enable these people in creating new identities and shirking due justice partially? The community suffers because of these violators in more ways than them having simply broken the rules.

[Ephi]

Originally Posted by Reddi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why do u hate me so much every interaction with you is a condescending negative one.

... Who are you?

[Heywood]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've seen basically every1 on so far post ban anyway so chances are if any1 got banned on red it's a bunch of non-factors no1 ever heard of

You're calling your guildie Tox1c1ty a non-factor, bru? Harsh.

[Bamzal Sherbet]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

a new version of MQ that was made just for R99, and supposedly works without detection

this is why we gotta name & shame. because the worst offender is playing right here

[hagard]

trolls gonna troll regardless.
RELEASE THE NAMES.
I'll donate 10$ on the front page paypal link.


ps. dont ban me 4 that last comment

[Agatha]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

l
MQ that was made just for R99, and supposedly works without detection.

are you guys in possesion of MQ MQ that was made for r99, or the totally different hook made from scratch? as far as i can tell your mq detection only detects MQ processes. There is a totally different program being run now.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Agatha [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

are you guys in possesion of MQ MQ that was made for r99, or the totally different hook made from scratch? as far as i can tell your mq detection only detects MQ processes. There is a totally different program being run now.

i wont discuss that in public. if u or anyone else has any info that u feel could be useful or compiles you wish to talk about, or wish to send me, then feel free to drop a PM, and you will have my full attention.

anything to rid this server of hax, sploits, and the people that use them, is in everybody's best interest.