NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Origen]

Police exist solely to protect private property, alt-right Karens, so celebrate them doing violence against the poor if you want to. It just shows your shitty reactionary "values"

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Police exist solely to protect private property, alt-right Karens, so celebrate them doing violence against the poor if you want to. It just shows your shitty reactionary "values"

You do know your own property is private property right?

If you don’t want your own private property to stay your property, why don’t you just give it all away?

Is it greed, or is it greed?

[Origen]

Wow, what a revelation. That never occured to me before, alt-right Karen. Never occured to a single commie, you're literally the first to think of it. Great job.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wow, what a revelation. That never occured to me before, alt-right Karen. Never occured to a single commie, you're literally the first to think of it. Great job.

So you admit that your property (as in the stuff in your house and registered to your name), is your private property

And the reason you’re not giving away everything not needed for your continued survival as a human is greed

So you are full of greed, like the stores, and like me

Kk

[Origen]

This video is basically the equivalent of a PhD in communism, as videos are the equivalent of facts in reactionary dumbass land.

[unsunghero]

^
If the video isn’t 30 seconds of someone calling you a greedy hypocrite, I dunno how accurate it is

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This video is basically the equivalent of a PhD in communism, as videos are the equivalent of facts in reactionary dumbass land.

It says private property is inherently theft but doesn't explain why.

Is it because the means of production are private property?

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The Nietzscheans in Andromeda were cool. Kevin Sorbo, however, isn't cool.

His views on how knowledge works is pure nihilism. That's kind of the irony. Lots of people think knowledge actually can be just "made up" -- talk about projection.

People who work in knowledge fields know that, relative to the field in question, it is damn hard to bullshit. In some fields near impossible. But a nihilist thinks everything is a con, or mainly a con. Because Jesus has to have something to destroy, amirite?

Actual Sorbo quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can fuck people up plenty. But if someone wants to know something, you can't stop them really. That's the entire premise of The Prisoner fer crissakes. "I am not a number!"

Not only have we gotten more pathetic at being full of sadness, we don't even have interesting cynics anymore. "Kevin Sorbo stuff" has his own forum over at FoH. Those guys like the masculine nature of his body, err, ideas.

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It says private property is inherently theft but doesn't explain why.

Is it because the means of production are private property?

That's because this is 19th century ideology, born from speculative philosophy. The alleged method is that the hypothesis will prove out.

That is how speculation works. You make a claim, and hope no one notices it is a contestable premise. Ideological movements suck like that.

Can it be explained? Yes, but it's keeps begging the question. For example, if we limit our definition of private property to "private ownership of means of production" (which includes capital itself, of course) the reason why private property is "theft" or in gneral "not right!" is because it is not fair, nor can it be fair, that the tools to earn a living are not controlled at all by the person who needs to make that living. It is ripe for exploitation, as history proves again and again.

But we've just introduced a whole raft of new premises. We have not clarified anything. What is "fair" for example?

Again, this is why ideology is bad. It is not designed to handle exploration or questions. It's secular dogmatics.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It says private property is inherently theft but doesn't explain why.

Is it because the means of production are private property?

“Private property is theft!” As they cling to their own possessions

Yard sale, everything other than clothes, food, medicine must go, everything free to a good home

Don’t want to do it?

Ohhhhh