Probably time for a Kyle Rittenhouse thread.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I missed this. Thank you for answering my question whether or not you are brain dead.

Partial phrasing and the fact you don’t understand what constitutes as Provocation doesn’t justify this vigilante murder in a place only law enforcement should be in.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

interpretation of wisconsin law isn't your strong suit, is it?

if Kyle had been one of the mob burning down kenosha, in your mind he'd have had "Every Right To Be There, It's His First Amendment Right" then you'd have been trying to find him on grinder, only to be disappointed, however i get the impression that feeling is a close friend of yours.

No one other than law enforcement should have been there and you are by your own admittance now are making it political

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Regardless of what Cletus (Elizundo) thinks

I said while the weapon was drawn the first victim without a weapon charged and died. This is a not proper stand your ground or proper self defense excuse to shot the victim 4 times and kill him.

This is still a vigilante murder in a place only law enforcement should be in.

specify, "without a weapon charged" if someone is pointing a firearm at you, you ALWAYS assume that a round has been racked or charged into the chamber.

maybe you meant, "attempted to close the distance"? If you have demonstrated belligerence in actions, and then make attempt to run me down, then there is a very good chance that I will fire at you, and having it all caught on video, I will be righteously exonerated.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OHHHH, I forgot, all of your gun knowledge comes from lib journos who never held a gun, and Hollywood where the guns aren't real unless you are Alec Baldwin.

You're right, he should have shot him 2cm above the knee, and 3cm to the right of the femur to subdue him, doing the least amount of damage. We've seen the movies. Only takes 1 shot.

Narrator: And this is an actual stupid lib argument against "too many" shots from police on meth heads with guns and knives about to kill people....

You are in fact brain dead. Are you aware of this?

Do you know how long it took to shoot 4 bullets? 0.75 seconds. But I am sure you caught that in the case during arguments...

# of bullets doesn't make self-defense just or unjust. I figure 1 second to fire as many bullets as you like to eliminate a threat to one's life is fair. Next lame argument, please.

You have not disproved the analogy but only added you political view.

[Castle2.0]

If you keep repeating "vigilante murder" it 100% proves your case. Good one.

You are in fact brain dead. The proof has been this conversation.

I don't mind debating with reasonable people. Your posts have shown you are not one.

I want to preserve my brain cells. Enjoy pushing your feckless arguments.

Kyle will walk free.

Cheers.

[Trexller]

Walk free? eh as much as I would like to see this hero freed, i believe they will pin some misdemeanor charge on him, so as to please the barely conscious simian libfacists.

while its a cut and dry self defense case, there is too much politics to consider.

The jury is out, and right now the Wizconsin governor and the rest of their cronies are trying to gauge how much political fallout that they will receive should Kyle be entirely exonerated. The backlash is palpable, and they know it, so they are gonna have to "go thru the motions of justice" and hit him with some trumped up lesser charge, so that they don't get their cities burned down by simians, but not really prosecuting an innocent kid either.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

specify, "without a weapon charged" if someone is pointing a firearm at you, you ALWAYS assume that a round has been racked or charged into the chamber.

maybe you meant, "attempted to close the distance"? If you have demonstrated belligerence in actions, and then make attempt to run me down, then there is a very good chance that I will fire at you, and having it all caught on video, I will be righteously exonerated.

The first victim had no weapons. Charging an individual who was first Provoked is not stand your ground or even a valid form of self defense allowing the victim to be shot and killed. That’s just the law sorry you don’t agree with it.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one other than law enforcement should have been there and you are by your own admittance now are making it political

Orange Dude offered to send in the national guard to assist and the WI guv denied the request bro

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Orange Dude offered to send in the national guard to assist and the WI guv denied the request bro

Like you irrelevant to the case.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Like you irrelevant to the case.

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one other than law enforcement should have been there and you are by your own admittance now are making it political

city was in flames and you don't think they needed help? 100 cops had it all under control?

you real low iq man