Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #481  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:11 AM
lecompte lecompte is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Down wind from RnF, 10x showers a day
Posts: 1,100
Default

This thread was.... interesting. More interesting than work, anyway. The "Official Proposal" requires too much GM intervention. I'm a fan of point system cause you know EVERYONE will keep track of that!~
  #482  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:14 AM
williestargell williestargell is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 355
Default

I'm not sure "commenting" on specific points of this agreement is worthwhile at all at this point. It seems to me that what was said about two factions existing is indeed the case. This proposal is unlikely to fly with the Cat B guilds without more radical change.

1) Enforcement is Key - not just enforcement of what mobs are available to who, but enforcement of training, ninja-looting, other dirty tricks. Requiring a 5 out of 6 super-majority pretty much eliminates any chance of enforcement. Competing with TMO/IB/FE is not the problem - putting up with their dirty tricks IS. Cat B guilds will still want to compete all month long and if we're getting intentionally trained, then we need the power to raid suspend, suspend toons, and even perma-ban people. There needs to be some radical change to this area.

2) The Cat A guilds need to give significantly more. Cat B guilds are not looking for anything for free, but saying you can have a handful of mobs one week a month (during which week the mob might never spawn) is completely and totally insufficient.

3) There is nothing in here about what happens when Velious comes out.

There are other proposals out there, and there will have to be compromise. Getting this done by the 2nd is highly unlikely. That's ok, we can all live without raid targets for a few days in order to achieve an agreement that will have more long-lasting benefits to everyone.
  #483  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:16 AM
Rhambuk Rhambuk is offline
Planar Protector

Rhambuk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lecompte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This thread was.... interesting. More interesting than work, anyway. The "Official Proposal" requires too much GM intervention. I'm a fan of point system cause you know EVERYONE will keep track of that!~
People are so anti gm intervention, im not sure if its they dont want to cause trouble on volunteers or if its something else but I am sure there are more than enough people that would be willing to volunteer to silently watch raids to make sure rules are followed.

Gm status, invisible don't show up on who no one would even know your watching, rules broken pop up stop it reset. if it goes smooth great.

I just don't see why people don't want the gm's involved
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar View Post
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh yea .... Piss Off.

H
  #484  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:18 AM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FE/IB/BDA/Taken/Div/TMO leaders all met in vent for 3 hrs

no policy was agreed to.....

we meet again on Wed

cross your fingers p99......
The good news that as a result of the meeting of the minds (or neckbeards [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ) was that alternatives have been discussed, as well as an alternative that the "majority" of the guilds would be on board with. It was not unanimous though. Because of that not going into any further detail of what "might be"

hopefully though they can get the remaining 10% on board soon.
  #485  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:19 AM
heazels heazels is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 230
Default

My proposal is a server wipe. Yours is almost good though npnp
  #486  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:33 AM
heazels heazels is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 230
Default

Add

TMO cannot kill trakanon unless he goes uncontested for 2 hrs since they have reached their allotment of trakanon teeth(600 teeth).
Last edited by heazels; 12-31-2013 at 11:35 AM..
  #487  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:41 AM
heazels heazels is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heazels [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Add

TMO cannot kill trakanon unless he goes uncontested for 2 hrs since they have reached their allotment of trakanon teeth(600 teeth).
Also turn off multiquesting, verant has always said it was a bug from the beginning and never intended... Thats why quest items are no drop.
  #488  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:43 AM
Rhambuk Rhambuk is offline
Planar Protector

Rhambuk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heazels [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also turn off multiquesting, verant has always said it was a bug from the beginning and never intended... Thats why quest items are no drop.
I've never seen a statement from verant claiming it was a bug.

and if it was it would be the best bug ever, so terrible to let epic drops rot because your wizard that needed the piece couldn't be online that night. Sorry man it dropped but we let it rot maybe youll get one in the next 6 months....


*
Though I do agree it should be turned off here.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar View Post
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh yea .... Piss Off.

H
Last edited by Rhambuk; 12-31-2013 at 11:44 AM.. Reason: *addition
  #489  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:46 AM
heazels heazels is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've never seen a statement from verant claiming it was a bug.

and if it was it would be the best bug ever, so terrible to let epic drops rot because your wizard that needed the piece couldn't be online that night. Sorry man it dropped but we let it rot maybe youll get one in the next 6 months....


*
Though I do agree it should be turned off here.
Unfortunately the message boards don't really exist anymore, not even on archive.org but it is true none-the-less. Think about it. Why would they take the time to make items NO-DROP? DUH
  #490  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:48 AM
heazels heazels is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've never seen a statement from verant claiming it was a bug.

and if it was it would be the best bug ever, so terrible to let epic drops rot because your wizard that needed the piece couldn't be online that night. Sorry man it dropped but we let it rot maybe youll get one in the next 6 months....


*
Though I do agree it should be turned off here.
how about, oh we cant farm trak teeth anymore, multiquesting is turned off so lets not prevent other guilds from getting in VP so much
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.