So when are you getting the COVID vaccine, anon?

[Horza]

owned em again keep on Tuckering bro

[starkind]

Starkind wouldn't be mad at starcat for licking starbutt and then rolling all over starface after licking starcats own starfurr.

So why should starkind be mad if some old guy or young at risk lady didn't get a vaccine.

Now if starkind's doctor ran around with the flu, coughing, and sniveling and wiping their nose with the back of their hand, or a nurse, or med tech. That's another story. Starkind may flare up some and tickle with some spicy tendrils of radioactive highly accelerated particle energies.

[starkind]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Starkind wouldn't be mad at starcat for licking starbutt and then rolling all over starface after licking starcats own starfurr.

So why should starkind be mad if some old guy or young at risk lady didn't get a vaccine.

Now if starkind's doctor ran around with the flu, coughing, and sniveling and wiping their nose with the back of their hand, or a nurse, or med tech. That's another story. Starkind may flare up some and tickle with some spicy tendrils of radioactive highly accelerated particle energies.

But starkind has completely wild and free range fast food junk in starkinds orbital systems anyway. So, um, starkind is kind of full of everything anyway. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tankwipe]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But starkind has completely wild and free range fast food junk in starkinds orbital systems anyway. So, um, starkind is kind of full of everything anyway. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you're alright star guy

[Snortles Chortles]

after the recent J&J vaccine developments, is it truly a radical opinion to want to err on the side of caution for those of us that wish to wait and see?

why can’t anyone offer a serious response to above opinion without resorting to ad hominem

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Snortles Chortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why can’t anyone offer a serious response to above opinion without resorting to ad hominem

owned

[Tankwipe]

Originally Posted by Snortles Chortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why can’t anyone offer a serious response to above opinion without resorting to ad hominem

because we are in rnf and no one here is capable of being vulnerable enough to provide the effort required to answer it. That or lazy and indifferent

[Keebz]

Originally Posted by Snortles Chortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

> after the recent J&J vaccine developments, is it truly a radical opinion to want to err on the side of caution for those of us that wish to wait and see?

why can’t anyone offer a serious response to above opinion without resorting to ad hominem

Bah, I'll bite. First, it was 6 deaths out of 6.8 million, which is still very good odds. Additionally, all six cases occurred among women between the ages of 18 and 48, which I think safely de-risks anyone in this forum. Lastly, they suspended its use out of an abundance of caution, so it's a moot point for now.

Meanwhile, there have been no reported deaths for the mRNA vaccines and they have administered hundreds of millions of those thus far (more than 100x of J&J).

Thankfully, you can more or less choose which vaccine to get at this stage, so if you are uncomfortable with the uncertainty around the inactivated virus vaccines, you have alternatives.

[Cassawary]

6 out of 6 million is not a real concern

[starkind]

Originally Posted by Cassawary [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

6 out of 6 million is not a real concern

finding out why is

some of those, if not all were completely healthy? shouldn't have died like they had a crushing injury.