Catherins attempt at lawyering

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thanks for reinforcing my original point : TMO is the greedy toddler at day care refusing to share community toys unless taken from him by force.

Grow up you child

Except TMO did share. You know... other than that basic fact that is the central point to your entire statement...other than that.

[Duckwalk]

The fact that youre pointing to 5 mobs out of a possible...how many in three years, really underscored how weak your argument is. Please stop

[Aviann]

Originally Posted by Uuruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did anyone else like this thread more before Alarti showed up?

[Duckwalk]

Yeah he's not too bright. He argues by deflecting the thread towards positions more beneficial to TMO rather than directly addressing them.

I imagine we will soon be discussing exactly when and where TMO shared mobs rather than the fact the number of mobs TMO has shared is so statistically insignificant as to be essentially worthless.

Pretty typical TMO spin squad actually.

[chief]

enjoy the non classic experience of getting free pixels class WoW.

[Duckwalk]

Originally Posted by chief [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

enjoy the non classic experience of getting free pixels class WoW.

You sound like you actually believe the countless hours spent staring at walls and waiting for mobs to spawn or farming seafuries so you could buy from TMO was well spent...that's sad.

[chief]

Different strokes for different folks pal, just because you don't agree with it does not mean its wrong in anyway. I'll enjoy the game I want to, and you the same.

[Duckwalk]

Originally Posted by chief [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Different strokes for different folks pal, just because you don't agree with it does not mean its wrong in anyway. I'll enjoy the game I want to, and you the same.

That's fine but after 3+ years of locking the rest of the server out of content and expecting everyone to play "your way" it becomes a problem. Especially, when you're selling (in one way or another) those same pixel back to players who have been waiting to access said content.

I've yet to see anything since I started playing on this server that would suggest TMO is anything more than a spoiled child refusing to share simply because they have the most time to throw at the game and can batphone quickest at awkward times.

And in my opinion those two factors shouldn't determine who controls the vast majority of raid content for over 3 years on a free to play version built so people could experience a 15 year old game.

[chief]

Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's fine but after 3+ years of locking the rest of the server out of content and expecting everyone to play "your way" it becomes a problem. Especially, when you're selling (in one way or another) those same pixel back to players who have been waiting to access said content.

I've yet to see anything since I started playing on this server that would suggest TMO is anything more than a spoiled child refusing to share simply because they have the most time to throw at the game and can batphone quickest at awkward times.

And in my opinion those two factors shouldn't determine who controls the vast majority of raid content for over 3 years on a free to play version built so people could experience a 15 year old game.

Hey guess what, guilds are no longer locked out of content , and haven't been for the last year? Classic EQ was never casual gamer friendly btw. I really don't know what you want me to say other then you are right and TMO are scum. Enjoy your 15 year old game content

[Cecily]

Ok you had a point before we had the sweeping raid policy changes. What exactly is you point now and how does it apply to P99 today? What is TMO, specifically TMO ofc, preventing other guilds from killing?