![]() |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
For those of you confused about the motive of Rittenhouse, this is worth watching. Hes not a kid aimlessly spraying bullets into a crowd of peaceful protesters. He was pursued, threatened and viciously attacked my a swarm of angry degenerates (separate from the peaceful BLM crowd). The kid had every reason to believe that he might end up beaten to death.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ctr=1600903760 | ||
|
Last edited by Topgunben; 09-23-2020 at 07:11 PM..
|
|
||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Well history is very manipulated so don't get too excited. What you think history will say about this fake pandemic
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
Population of USA at the time was 103,000,000 Death toll for the Spanish flu was 675,000; over an 18 month period. Surprisingly this thing hit the 20-40 year old demographic pretty hard; with 30 year olds getting the worst of it. So why were 30 year olds hit the hardest. Not known at the time but has been studied recently is the role childhood nutrition plays in adult immune systems. Relevant NIH study. Everybody knows and has heard about the 1930's great depression. Very few people know about the 2nd worst depression in US history (yes, even worse than the 2008 crash) started in May 1893. This meant a lot of expectant mothers and young children had very poor nutrition for a couple years. Fast forward to 1918 and all those young kids are now adults with poor immune systems. People born in the late 1830's through mid 1840's are now civil war vets; this demographic gets hit very hard also. Finally the very young are hit hard as well; ie, very weak immune system that can't fight this thing off. Although some people today are nutritionally deficient even the worst off are in better overall shape than the average person in the 1890's. This isn't to say people aren't dying or getting wrecked because of this virus but perspective is a hell of a drug. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
Read the names of God translation of the Bible and ask yourself why the creation account is detailed twice, in Gen 1 and Gen 2, and why different names are used for Elohim and Yahweh, and then cross reference that with the same nomenclature switcherino in Psalms 22, as well as the tricky language used to delineate parentage of Cain, Abel, and Seth in Gen 4, and which name the first fruits/flock were blood-sacrificed to, and which name Christ called out in Matthew 27:46, and how that relates to the statment made in John 8:44 and Gen 3:15, but what do i gno... | |||
|
Last edited by Gwaihir; 09-25-2020 at 01:26 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
Adherence to the commandments doesn't provide salvation. This was made pretty clear. Salvation is given by grace; not earned. All of the Old Testament is merely outlining the guidelines by which the only Christ would live a full life without transgressing. Hope this helps. Seek Christ. | |||
|
Last edited by Gwaihir; 09-25-2020 at 01:06 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
The purpose of the first narrative (Gen 1:1–2:4a) is about establishing a relationship between God and humans, and the second account (Gen 2:4b-25) is about building a relationship in the most essential human bond, marriage. These two relationships, vertical and horizontal, are complementary and must always come in the described ordered sequence so that life can be meaningful, beautiful, and happy. First comes a cultivation of a loving relationship with God, then with our marriage partner, and finally with others. The closer we are to God, the closer we should be to our spouses and to others. Only God can provide all the resources for life so we can be a contribution and blessing to each other. We were created in total dependency upon God; therefore, only from him can we receive all we need for building deep and lasting relationships. Source: A fresh look at two genesis creation accounts. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|