OFFICIAL PROPOSAL from FE/TMO

[Argh]

This is still the only reasonable concept put forth. It doesn't completely overhaul the philosophy of raiding and more importantly it does nothing to increase the barrier to entry for newer guilds, lesser guilds, or pickup raids from breaking in.

I think most people here would have been thrilled if this raid agreement would have been proposed three weeks ago.

However, I do think there are some changes that should be made to this before going live with it. Most of these have been listed through this thread (limiting mobs on prioritized list, change attempt of vp to successful attempt, 90 day period to 30 day period, hands off period from 7d to 10d.)

I think BDA/Taken should be working to amend this proposal rather than pushing for the creation of an entirely new system of raiding that is radically divergent from the current one.

[Erati]

FE/IB/BDA/Taken/Div/TMO leaders all met in vent for 3 hrs

no policy was agreed to.....

we meet again on Wed

cross your fingers p99......

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What you guys seem to fail to realize is that we've been in Kunark so long now, we're actually about due for LDoN. Instances are in fact classic at this point.

I Don't see PoP/Luclin or Velious......

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I Don't see PoP/Luclin or Velious......

Well, no one ever accused you of being perceptive....

[Xadion]

no agreement was met because the 'lower tier' guilds are pulling a power play to create a communistic rotation, and that's not meant as a flame, its really a form of commune thought- that all the community is all entitled to an equal share of the wealth and those that do high end jobs and have high education and or experience get and should have the same as the low end workers and non experienced peoples.

the masses love it!

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, no one ever accused you of being perceptive....

You see PoP/Velious/Luclin? Because you would have to for your previous statement to have any point whatsoever.
But you aren't an idiot, probably just trollin', right?

[kotton05]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

FE/IB/BDA/Taken/Div/TMO leaders all met in vent for 3 hrs

no policy was agreed to.....

we meet again on Wed

cross your fingers p99......

God when I saw this I wanted to blow my brains out I have a solution that'll help all but no one will listen and I don't feel like pounding it into the heads of the ten FE officers:-/

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You see PoP/Velious/Luclin? Because you would have to for your previous statement to have any point whatsoever.
But you aren't an idiot, probably just trollin', right?

I don't have the same faith that you're not an idiot. I also don't really want to hold your hand because I don't know where it's been, so I guess my point will remain a mystery to you.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't have the same faith that you're not an idiot. I also don't really want to hold your hand because I don't know where it's been, so I guess my point will remain a mystery to you.

Your point doesn't apply to this situation! Try again next time buddy.

[drktmplr12]

1. Punish the act of using a camped raid to engage a target. This practice prevents competition and is in itself, no form of competition.
2. Tiered content.
3. Limitations based on tier.
4. High council to determine tiers.

The hard part comes in determining who will sit at the council.

Personally I think putting guilds into categories is a recipe for disaster and will get far too complicated for a council to manage. Its easier to categorize mobs.