Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #451  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:04 PM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
10-11 or 12-13 times? Losing count now. Backed you into a corner and you went off into the deep end. I will consider this a win for what it is worth. Have a good night.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Doesn%27t+like+...ted+knowledge.
  #452  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:05 PM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

The best part about this is when it searches, it's spell checks all my mistakes! NICE!
  #453  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:15 PM
RobotElvis RobotElvis is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I mentioned DNA, the geological record, and fossils. All point to the same thing...evolution.

Here is a some proof for you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...8FfMBYCkk#t=21

If you were even slightly interested in finding proof of evolution you would have already. Anyone who has done even the basic research could see which side is being dishonest. I will ask you to do the same as another poster. Simply type the word "debunked" after the crazy shit you are about to post. Chances are that someone has already proven the creationist propaganda false and they will give you a far more insightful and rigorous answer than I most likely.
"Chances are"........... What faith you have.

Why not take you're own advice and do some research yourself.

But as you say evolution isn't religion, you just happen to put faith in other peoples abilities to debunk what you don't want to believe.
  #454  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:49 PM
KagatobLuvsAnimu KagatobLuvsAnimu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
According to Prof. R. S. Lull and other evolutionists, "The skull of the pithecanthropus is characterized by a limited capacity of about two-thirds that of a man."Assuming that this skull is that of a normal creature of that age, as is done in all the arguments of "our friends, the enemy," then the pithecanthropus must have lived 20,000,000 years ago, one-third the period assigned to life. Evolutionists claim the pithecanthropus lived 750,000 years ago; later the guess is reduced to 375,000.

Does any one in his senses believe that an ape-human animal developed one-third of the normal human brain in 375,000 or 750,000 years, when it took 59,250,000 years to develop two-thirds of the brain? If one-third of the normal brain developed in the last 750,000 years, the rate of development must have been 39.5 times as great as in the preceding 59,250,000 years. If one-third developed in the last 375,000 years, the rate of development must have been 78 times as rapid as in the preceding 59,625,000 years. This is incredible. If life began 500,000,000 years ago, and one-third the brain developed in the last 750,000 years, the rate must have been 332 times as rapid as in the preceding 499,250,000 years; and 666 times as rapid in 375,000 years as in the preceding 499,625,000 years. All these guesses are clearly impossible.

In like manner, if the Piltdown man had the estimated brain capacity of 1070 c.c., instead of the normal 1500 c.c., this fabricated creature must have lived about 17,200,000 years ago, if life began 60,000,000 years ago; and 143,333,333 years ago, if life began 500,000,000 years ago.

Prof. Schaaffhausen, the discoverer, estimated the capacity of the Neanderthal man at 1033 c.c. Then he must have lived 18,680,000 years ago, if we accept the 60,000,000 year period; and 311,333,333 years ago, if we accept Prof. Russell's guess of 1,000,000,000 years.


And in all these long ages, fragments of only four skeletons of very doubtful character have been found, and upon this flimsy proof, the youth of our land are expected by self-styled "scientists" to believe it!
This is a jumbled mess that makes a ton of assumptions, including but not limited to: implying the scientific community doesn't correct it's hypotheses as new information is gathered, brain development has a set rate at which it can happen, that there are only 4 protohuman skeletons in existence (seriously WTF) and that said skeletons are fabricated.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #455  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:50 PM
KagatobLuvsAnimu KagatobLuvsAnimu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"Chances are"........... What faith you have.

Why not take you're own advice and do some research yourself.

But as you say evolution isn't religion, you just happen to put faith in other peoples abilities to debunk what you don't want to believe.
Probability is a religion, you heard it here first folks.
  #456  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:55 PM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

You guys just don't get it. You make claims that basically only science is aloud to make up fabricated stuff, but someone that believes in God isn't. That is really the entire thread.
  #457  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:56 PM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

Oh and that all scientific theories are absolute and 100% correct. They are aloud to adjust these theories though, but religious people aren't.
  #458  
Old 09-20-2014, 08:58 PM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

oh and debunked
  #459  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:01 PM
RobotElvis RobotElvis is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a jumbled mess that makes a ton of assumptions, including but not limited to: implying the scientific community doesn't correct it's hypotheses as new information is gathered, brain development has a set rate at which it can happen, that there are only 4 protohuman skeletons in existence (seriously WTF) and that said skeletons are fabricated.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Previous post from Kaga: Yes it's known as "margin of error" and the % correlation is not only relevant, it's the entire purpose of doing the experiment. Science is about predictions. You are still not talking about science.

Having a hypotheses isn't exclusive to the scientific method anymore than wings are exclusive to airplanes.

Please learn the error in how you continue to conflate everything.
End quote




So according to your definition of the scientific method e.g. "Prediction", then my post was scientific. Thanks
  #460  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:02 PM
KagatobLuvsAnimu KagatobLuvsAnimu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You guys just don't get it. You make claims that basically only science is aloud to make up fabricated stuff, but someone that believes in God isn't. That is really the entire thread.
Once again you conflate two things.

Observing the available evidence and accepting the most likely conclusion via testing as "factual" is one thing (there are no facts in science, even existence itself is merely assumed but that's too advanced for you so I'll go no further.).
Preaching "Christian truth" and calling all forms of evidence fabricated (note no evidence of fabrication is provided) is another thing entirely.

It's clear nothing will change your mind. My mind on the other hand... to quote Bill Nye. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.