NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Origen]

Remember when Bill Clinton said “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”?

That's basically the sort of fraternity bro defense the online right is adopting. They just happen to be defending a pedophile/rapist, just like Bill Clinton was.

It's gratifying to watch them cope and seethe.

[Evia]

It's not as gratifying as watching you have a full come apart on elf forum over orange man, I promise.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by PRogers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fraud cannot be proven. Lying cannot be proven. After all, we simply cant know what anyone was thinking so all fraud is now legal. "I didnt know I was lying about stealing all your money when I promised to give you a 10% return on investment".

Thats dumb. "There is just no way to know anything, really." - right wingers.

It doesn't matter what Tromp thinks, unreasonable people go to jail all the time.

[Elizondo]

someone was logged into their alt account

lawl ...

[arvidez]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't try to rope a dope me.

What is the mechanism by which my thoughts are not mine? Before you answer, let me warn you, I am a technological determinist. I don't believe in free will.

I believe in the 7th Fleet
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if you have ears to hear. or without free will, ears that will hear for you...

orange man has been designed to evoke emotions. these emotions come "imbued with thoughts".

i sometimes image tech being the flower to the stem of humanity..but mostly not

[Homesteaded]

Originally Posted by PRogers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fraud cannot be proven. Lying cannot be proven. After all, we simply cant know what anyone was thinking so all fraud is now legal. "I didnt know I was lying about stealing all your money when I promised to give you a 10% return on investment".

Thats dumb. "There is just no way to know anything, really." - right wingers.

No see you don’t get it. The rule of law says you need to prove that the defendant knew the election was lost and was trying to steal/overturn an election he knew he lost. That is not the same as someone who thinks the election was stolen.

Ask yourself this, what action is too far if a US election was stolen?

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

someone was logged into their alt account

lawl ...

Cope and seethe, buckaroo, I'm lovin' it

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Homesteaded [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The rule of law says you need to prove that the defendant knew the election was lost and was trying to steal/overturn an election he knew he lost.

Polly want a cracker? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Homesteaded [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This doesn’t mean what you think it does. This half baked theory hinges on proving Trump didn’t think the election was stolen. He’s been saying it was stolen loudly and publicly for years.

The documents case is stronger but it’s also a crime that has been ignored in the past. You decide why it’s now such a pressing issue. It’s corruption. It’s also a “crime” no one gives a shit about.

Why aren’t they charging him with charges relating to Jan 6 INSURRECTION!!! because they don’t have anything to go on.

After Russia hoax, pee tape, Ukraine, allllll of these were jokes and political moves. It’s astonishing to see so many still buying this narrative. All because you don’t like the heel, or can’t appreciate it.

There is a sick part of me which would love to see how your mind calculates likelihoods, but then I realize, I know how it's done already. You begin with the preferred conclusion, then backplow the reasoning to get there.

Trumpers always say it is the people trying to hold him accountable who are "obsessed" but that's something I wish you could understand. I'm no more obsessed about him than I am any other predator. I like to see them held accountable, yes.

There are a lot of predators in the world. The secret to sanity is to be cool, calm, and collected about trying to bring justice.

Consider who is obsessed here very carefully, He-Who-Speaks-With-God.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

*get whoever is going to be running against Biden. If not Trump, I guarantee the lawsuits and investigations will happen to whoever replaces him as well

Who is running this design? Seriously. What is the racket? Because you are claiming, the full force of our government is arbitrarily being brought against Trump, and if he were to go away this full force would simply be "conjured" against whoever takes his place as Biden's opponent.

Who or what is the conjurer, and what is their or its goal?

Amazingly simple question.