![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Will you take the coronavirus vaccine? | |||
| Yes, Absolutely. I cannot wait for it. |
|
24 | 43.64% |
| Maybe, I am reluctant but scared of covid |
|
10 | 18.18% |
| Not likely, I dont think i need it |
|
10 | 18.18% |
| Never, I dont take vaccines. |
|
7 | 12.73% |
| I cant it reacts with my hormone pills |
|
4 | 7.27% |
| Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's ok, Sleepy Joe forgives your ignorance and is still willing to be your president. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||||
|
Quote:
You don't use antibiotics for viral infections. Antibiotics are often prescribed for patients with covid pneumonia due to other (bacterial) complications. Antibiotics are necessary to fight a lot of bacterial infections. The reason you take the entire course of antibiotics or shouldn't use them if you don't actually need them is bacteria can build resistance towards antibiotics, making it more difficult to kill them. The more you know.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
You don't know shit
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
You call a laptop a labtop, you sound like a scientist, but, your probably an idiot.
-Donald Trump | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Some experts have chimed in and said it takes over a year to synthesize a vaccine for anything effectively... this covid one might have been pushed out the door a little too soon.
Not saying "they" didn't do their best with it, but regardless... I'd prefer to wait and see til the first batches are done and what the general consensus is. The fact that some are only 80% or less effective just makes it seem pointless.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
newsflash: eating healthy, exercising, and just taking care of yourself in general is the best medicine | |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
Ask Lune. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
They never got critical population penetration w/ SARS in order to continue and conclude trials. With COVID they did. The only things missing or rushed from the COVID trials were some population diversity and the several years of post-vaccine followup they typical do with studies. In terms of 80% effective, you're using the same stupid logic you hear people (Trumptards and assorted morons) use in the US -- "If it's not 100% effective it doesn't work". The goal for a vaccine is not a 100% invulnerability shield. In the JnJ vaccine, for example, they had zero deaths and almost no serious illness from COVID. With these vaccines, the point seems to be to get a shot. You might get a reaction that is like a 24-hour flu that 100% won't kill you. What you get in return is pretty reasonable assurance that you either won't get COVID or, if you do, you'll be asymptomatic or have mild symptoms. You morons really need better news sources. There is article after article explaining in detail how this works. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|