Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #441  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:10 PM
Naethyn Naethyn is offline
Planar Protector

Naethyn's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,192
Default

New to the raid scene since November. The professionalism of Rampage was the biggest draw. It didn't take long at all to see Forsaken's leadership consistently act like children. I would be embarrassed to follow Detoxx and so should you.
__________________
  #442  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:10 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joyelle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also, Taken immediately left the zone when we got DQ'd from Yelinak and did not in any way assist Rampage with that kill. We did not coth anyone, we did not heal or buff anyone, we did not do damage to or debuff Yeli at all, and we did not take a single pixel from the killing of that mob.

Prove that Asgard was not on any of the encounter logs for you suspended mobs, did not assist you in any way, and did not receive even one single pixel from each of them?

Maybe then we can talk about how the situations are comparable.
Doesn't matter if you left the zone. YOU were one of THEIR trackers. The normal course of action is for both guilds to concede and leave. Rampage didn't in this situation. Yet somehow it was OK ? I mean you guys can't really be defending this in front of the server can you ?
  #443  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:11 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why are you avoiding what I am asking ? Why spin and deflect your blame ?
What are you asking I alrdy explained how those situations are completely different and provided an example of how it should function properly with the draco suspension of Taken/Rampage.

You insisting that 'we continued to the encounter' is false - we vacated the zone the second Breaken got FTE and believe me we were pissed about it. That was our Yelinak head on rotation!

and the other thing about tracking - I alrdy said we immediately vacated the encounter meaning Breaken didnt assist after that point of FTE so the tracking he did prior to the spawn time is irrelevant bc the violation occurred at the pop and we acted accordingly.

I am not trying to break down why or not why those Forsaken suspensions are just or not - I would just want to see consistency for guilds who take part in joint kills IE the encounter ( slaying ) and the spoils ( looting ) be punished as 1.
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #444  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:13 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,560
Default

work flew by - see everyone in Norrath

move this to RnF
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #445  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:13 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What are you asking I alrdy explained how those situations are completely different and provided an example of how it should function properly with the draco suspension of Taken/Rampage.

You insisting that 'we continued to the encounter' is false - we vacated the zone the second Breaken got FTE and believe me we were pissed about it. That was our Yelinak head on rotation!

and the other thing about tracking - I alrdy said we immediately vacated the encounter meaning Breaken didnt assist after that point of FTE so the tracking he did prior to the spawn time is irrelevant bc the violation occurred at the pop and we acted accordingly.

I am not trying to break down why or not why those Forsaken suspensions are just or not - I would just want to see consistency for guilds who take part in joint kills IE the encounter ( slaying ) and the spoils ( looting ) be punished as 1.
Yet, you can clearly see the infractions that happened and don't get punished correct ? Why not say "If you guys got punished for that so we should have been punished for this". It has to raise questions for why you weren't. All I want is consistency too and it isn't there.
  #446  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:15 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
work flew by - see everyone in Norrath

move this to RnF
Same actually. See you guys later.
  #447  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:16 PM
Lanuven Lanuven is offline
Fire Giant

Lanuven's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yet, you can clearly see the infractions that happened and don't get punished correct ? Why not say "If you guys got punished for that so we should have been punished for this". It has to raise questions for why you weren't. All I want is consistency too and it isn't there.
You talk about consistency while we are eating 2 raid suspensions for a Draco in our camp engaged while we AE'd down the adds. We had plenty of people on the encounter log and we still got in trouble. While Asgard is free from punishment on said mobs when they clearly assisted in the kill and benefited from the loot.
  #448  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:17 PM
colicab colicab is offline
Aviak

colicab's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 57
Default

Lets both admit that ToV is not designed for two raids of 100+ people each especially with the monstrosity of train ups/downs that have been created.

I know I am in the camp of root all the things... This server would fuck that up too though, I am quite sure of that.
__________________
Shadowrath <Rustle> - 60 Necromancer - Retired
Stankydanky <Rustle> - 60 Shadow Knight - Retired
Stankydanky <IVAS> - 60 Monk - Phinny
  #449  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:18 PM
colicab colicab is offline
Aviak

colicab's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanuven [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You talk about consistency while we are eating 2 raid suspensions for a Draco in our camp engaged while we AE'd down the adds. We had plenty of people on the encounter log and we still got in trouble. While Asgard is free from punishment on said mobs when they clearly assisted in the kill and benefited from the loot.
Excellent point. Seeing as this is every single CT encounter... AoE adds while CT is tanked. Interesting...
__________________
Shadowrath <Rustle> - 60 Necromancer - Retired
Stankydanky <Rustle> - 60 Shadow Knight - Retired
Stankydanky <IVAS> - 60 Monk - Phinny
  #450  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:21 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
<idiots and savages>, duh

Batphoning argh as we speak

Watch out ec tunnel
Glory awaits.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.