Proposition For Raid Rules - Input Requested

[Ungriim]

Originally Posted by Sarius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't see what the big deal would be for non-raiders to not camp out in Seb or KC. I'm sure there would be some cross-fire, but it would be minimal

Cheating it would be too easy to the point of it not serving a real purpose. Just log next zone over and rush - delays the engage by a minute or 2 but still goes to the same guilds more than likely

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Ungriim [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cheating it would be too easy to the point of it not serving a real purpose. Just log next zone over and rush - delays the engage by a minute or 2 but still goes to the same guilds more than likely

I don't know, it'd make Trak and VS both a real race, what with Gore in DL. CT would be interesting once the DT cycles go off and people can't camp them off without crippling their raid force, there's definite potential for interference there.

Just spitballing. Could limit the rez effects to anyone camped out that's 58+ to minimize disruption to people exping in the zone, maybe 50+ for Naggy and Vox. The idea probably doesn't have legs though, seeing as how unclassic it is and how much it would impose on the devs to implement it.

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Should just make it so that if you log in after camping out in a raid zone, it treats you as if you've just been rezzed. Would give a huge disadvantage to parking toons.

Add "if a raid mob is indeed up" to that, perhaps.

[quido]

I personally am more interested in seeing guilds like Europa, Azure Guard, other smaller/newer/off-hours guilds get attempts at killing mobs than I am in seeing that BDA and/or Taken get regular kills.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I personally am more interested in seeing guilds like Europa, Azure Guard, other smaller/newer/off-hours guilds get attempts at killing mobs than I am in seeing that BDA and/or Taken get regular kills.

I can assure you, BDA feels this way about TMO.

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I personally am more interested in seeing guilds like Europa, Azure Guard, other smaller/newer/off-hours guilds get attempts at killing mobs than I am in seeing that BDA and/or Taken get regular kills.

Yes, Jeremy, we know TMO has an interest in seeing their distant competition get kills/gear over the guilds that are directly behind TMO/FE/IB in terms of competition. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[quido]

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, Jeremy, we know TMO has an interest in seeing their distant competition get kills/gear over the guilds that are directly behind TMO/FE/IB in terms of competition. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't consider BDA and Taken competition in the least. They are simply guilds that have killed this stuff a bunch of times, and the others are guilds that haven't.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't consider BDA and Taken competition in the least. They are simply guilds that have killed this stuff a bunch of times, and the others are guilds that haven't.

So according to TMO, BDA has killed these raid mobs too many times...

[quido]

According to me, you've killed a lot of this stuff a bunch of times. Stop being dumb.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So according to TMO, BDA has killed these raid mobs too many times...

funny that pride and greed could bring down raiding in velious to nil when that's what everyone bashed/es tmo for