![]() |
|
#4471
|
||||
|
Quote:
He also scores points for asking lots of clarifying questions. I would say he is a better debater than Anna Kasparian of the Young Turks. The only areas where I would put her ahead is she is much more attractive (although needs to tone down the damn makeup, Jesus), and she makes concessions. I haven’t heard Sam make a concession ever Too many concessions makes you look weak to the audience. Too few and you seem close-minded | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4472
|
|||
|
^
Oh and the phrasing of a clarifying question is everything. Clarifying with the correct phrasing implies “I want to understand you better on this”, and in a non-condescending way (which is crucial), but most debaters prefer to try to “clarify” by doing some stupid fuckin gotcha “OH SO YOU MEAN [this]?!” | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4473
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4475
|
|||
|
The other reason why I think concessions seem to be a lost art of debates is that you are not 100% right on every point you’re making. The audience knows you’re not right on 100% of the things you say. They just don’t know which things you aren’t right about (sometimes they do)
So if you never concede “ok that is correct” or “ok that is a fair point” or “ok I might be wrong on that point” then in addition to looking close-minded the audience is also suspecting somewhere in all those facts were lies | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4476
|
|||||
|
Quote:
You do realize I despise the Democratic party as well, right? Like Origen said, it's just that the alternative is an even bigger dumpster fire. Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#4478
|
|||
|
Most alt-right folks here seem to assume that anyone who is critical of the right is a democrat supporter.
Don't help the alt-right by telling them if and when they happen to be accidentally correct about their sloppy critique of the Democrats. The Democrats are a right-wing party. Let them fight. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4480
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|