Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Funny how shamans need pocket clerics but clerics do not need pocket shamans.

See? He dodged again. The question wasn't "Do Shamans need Pocket Clerics?" or "Do Clerics need Pocket Shamans?"

The question is "Why are Pocket Clerics not allowed?"

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The question is "Why are Pocket Clerics not allowed?"

Best 4 person all caster/priest group

It is right in the title.

Why are you so bricked-up about wanting a pocket cleric? Perhaps it’s because shamans are gonna need a pocket cleric while Clerics don’t need or want a pocket shaman when grouped with 2x enchanters + a third caster?

Up to page 31 now. We have gotten to the point where you were challenged to join a fast paced, high dps xp group (of any composition) and show how you could sustain anything close to mage-level dps. If memory serves correctly- you never did. I would have then and still would bet good money you and your pet combined would fail to actually out out as much dps as the mage pet by itself, much less the mage’s nukes and DS.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

See? He dodged again.
The question is "Why are Pocket Clerics not allowed?"

The question is also "Where is the evidence that supports DSM's tens/hundreds/thousands of posts claiming a Shaman can/does improve a group's DPS more than a non-Epic Mage by root rotting multiple mobs parallel to their group?"

Is DSM going to dodge again? Call me a troll? A combination?

[Troxx]

Why do you need pocket characters so badly? You have yet to answer that question.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why do you need pocket characters so badly? You have yet to answer that question.

I've answered that many times already. You can check the post history.

Pocket characters are a common part of P99. Anybody who wants to min/max their solo game, static group, etc. is going to have them.

I'm sure you know at least one Enchanter who has a pocket cleric camped nearby for a res. Why would said Enchanter suddenly give that up in a static group?

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pocket characters are a common part of P99. Anybody who wants to min/max their solo game, static group, etc. is going to have them.

Stipulations:
-4 characters
-all have to be casters or priests

Not 4 characters + a bunch of pockets. That’s as absurd to the point of this thread as changing the other stipulation to allow for a tank, melee or hybrid.

Why do you so strongly need to have pockets? Is it because the shaman will need a pocket cleric? Cause the cleric does not need a pocket shaman for the group to be 100% successful.

It’s ok bro. We know the reason you are dying on pocket_cleric hill. You’re just too proud to be honest about it.

[Troxx]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...406923&page=38


Ooo page 38. Zura has so thoroughly debunked DSM that we see the first episode of caustic copy/paste reposting. 3x on one page we see a copy/paste of wall-of-text garbage.

Danth spanks him lightly for this at the top of page 39

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The howling stones video he keeps referencing actually disproves this claim, which was the actual point of the video. I showed I could sustain Direct Damage DPS across a two hour group session while doing other Shaman duties, in the same manner I showed Shaman Direct Damage DPS in a solo video.

All other duties? Like how you failed to heal the enchanter less than 5 minutes in and left him at 3%, saved only by the skin of his teeth because someone else saved him? We all saw that video.

As for you sustaining damage, I can promise you it was less than what a mage pet (probably even unhasted) could do.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...406923&page=38


Ooo page 38. Zura has so thoroughly debunked DSM that we see the first episode of caustic copy/paste reposting. 3x on one page we see a copy/paste of wall-of-text garbage.

Danth spanks him lightly for this at the top of page 39

More dodging.

As you can see, he can't explain why pocket characters are allowed.

He can't admit I disproved his claim solo videos could not be translated into group scenarios, even though the howling stones video proved him wrong.

[Troxx]

If a mage is dying because of an another member - the whole group is dead and nobody is doing any dps.

Playing a mage is so lazy and out-of-the way that they’ll be the last one to die most likely (excluding FD classes)

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If a mage is dying because of an another member - the whole group is dead and nobody is doing any dps.

Playing a mage is so lazy and out-of-the way that they’ll be the last one to die most likely (excluding FD classes)

I meant to say Mage Pet, I fixed that in the post. If a group member keeps getting the Mage Pet killed, the Mage's DPS will look low on paper.

That doesn't mean that is the actual DPS numbers a Mage could do, but without logs you'd only see the DPS parses. Thats one reason why I ask for logs, they provide context.