Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

More trolling and no substance. The trolls just band together when they cannot win the debate with substance, logic, and reason.

It just scares people away from the forums and maybe P99.

Nobody needs to debate with you

Your own video with fail game play settled the argument

[Troxx]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...=406923&page=5

lol like seriously this entire page is mostly DSM talking about how dangerous enchanter charms are and how bad things happen and will set you back.

Compare that to now where he considers himself as a shaman to be Jesus, the flash and Batman …. Simultaneously capable of doing all the things/utility you want a shaman for and magically bippityboppityboop_ing away the risk cause he can handle that too. lol!

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It happens. If you are in an easy area it doesn't really matter what your group comp is. But in a riskier/higher level zone like Chardok 3x breaks are going to be bad news. That's the point. Nobody cares about what level 40 Enchanters can do hehe, because it's all easy content.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The reality is if you get one of those wipe situations it will seriously set you back in terms of how many kills you are getting per hour. The average is what matters at the end of the day, not how far you can push the game at the cost of having too much risk of a wipe.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...=406923&page=5

lol like seriously this entire page is mostly DSM talking about how dangerous enchanter charms are and how bad things happen and will set you back.

Compare that to now where he considers himself as a shaman to be Jesus, the flash and Batman …. Simultaneously capable of doing all the things/utility you want a shaman for and magically bippityboppityboop_ing away the risk cause he can handle that too. lol!

Troxx seems to forget (or didn't read) that discussion was about 3 Enchanters, which I am not advocating for lol.

[Troxx]

Cyxth,

He has never been interested in having a civil discussion about any topic he’s made up his mind on. When confronted with logic/information that erodes his understanding of reality it’s like his brainstem kicks in and enacts subconscious defensive countermeasures to protect his terminally frail sense of self.

Countermeasures thus far observed (in order or frequency seen)

-call the person a troll
-refuse to confront reality and smokescreen with a strawman counter-question as a flare, refuse to engage in the topic at hand until other parties play by his rules and answer demanded questions
-move a goalpost
-thank people for concessions not given
-“as you can see” … talk to an imaginary audience that isn’t there
-change the parameters of reality and/or redefine the situation/question

[DeathsSilkyMist]

People can look at the post history and decide for themselves. It is not on your side I am afraid. People can see for themselves what you are doing. They don't need to take my word for it, or yours.

If you think calling people you disagree with "retarded" in hundreds of different posts as a simple example is civil, you have a strange definition of the term.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People can look at the post history and decide for themselves. It is not on your side I am afraid.

I am only on the side of the truth.

Unfortunately the truth is, people simply can't look at any post history in which you provide any evidence of a Shaman root rotting adds parallel to their group because you simply never provided any such evidence, even though you argued for tens/hundreds/thousands of posts that by doing so a Shaman would/could improve a group's DPS more than a non-Epic Mage. I fear you are not going to convince many logical, rational people to believe your claims if you cannot provide evidence to support the claims.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cyxth,

He has never been interested in having a civil discussion about any topic he’s made up his mind on. When confronted with logic/information that erodes his understanding of reality it’s like his brainstem kicks in and enacts subconscious defensive countermeasures to protect his terminally frail sense of self.

Countermeasures thus far observed (in order or frequency seen)

-call the person a troll
-refuse to confront reality and smokescreen with a strawman counter-question as a flare, refuse to engage in the topic at hand until other parties play by his rules and answer demanded questions
-move a goalpost
-thank people for concessions not given
-“as you can see” … talk to an imaginary audience that isn’t there
-change the parameters of reality and/or redefine the situation/question

I think you're spot on. Many posters have tried to engage in discussion, to simply be called a troll, their arguments dismissed and/or ignored while DSM constructs straw men to argue against instead, and then demands the other person provide evidence to support the straw man DSM created (LOL!). Wild when he won't or can't even provide evidence to support his own claims.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

You can choose to believe that if you wish.

It seems like the debate is over, as trolls like troxx and cyxthryth are posting nonsense and agreeing with each other.

This happens when points have been made that they cannot rebut. They seem to think flooding the thread with these posts makes them look good, and me look bad. The post history disproves the nonsense.

And they wonder why the thread is 500+ pages.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Countermeasures thus far observed (in order or frequency seen)

You left out one of my favorites, dismissing a reasonable counterpoint as “silly” instead of engaging seriously.

[Troxx]

Funny how shamans need pocket clerics but clerics do not need pocket shamans.

I’m up to page 27 and so far it’s getting spicy with literally everyone disagreeing with you. Danth took perhaps the most “you friendly” approach but even he had to put you in your place - and for the record he advocated for a 3rd ench or a necro - debating that shaman vs mage was a debate amongst inferior choices.