NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's an opportunity on this page to show the class that you are opposed to anti-semitic statements, right-wing reader.

Suits me fine if he embarrasses himself and the rest of them.

Also, not a circus seal.

[Homesteaded]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nah, I've known all along why I get personal attacks. I don't wonder at all. I've been dealing with hateful reactionaries for years, I know their tactics.

You talk with low information reactionaries who sequester themselves in safe spaces, you use terms like fascist. You fight fire, you get burned sometimes.

There is a saying that goes something like this.

If you run into three assholes a day, chances are you’re the asshole.

I’ve refined my number to one.

[Origen]

I'm not running into squat. I come here by choice and I will leave by choice. I'm not here to befriend the right, I am here to attack it. Tell yourself I am surprised by your hateful reactions if it suits you, just more running off with the wrong takeaway rather than a hard look in the mirror.

[Landroval]

Your view lacks the axiomatic precepts to address the issues you decry, though.

You presume to be a socialist who is against the concept of personal wealth and private property, yet the largest "occupying group" of this group is Jewish, which you refuse to acknowledge (deliberately).

Your inability to make this connection leaves you talking in circles about insignificant and contrived issues that operate under the axiomatic hierarchy you refuse to address

[Origen]

Here, instead of me slinging shit everywhere let us gaze upon this briefly leaked document

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Remain skeptical!!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Landroval]

Goedel's incompleteness theorem states that no system can be defined by sub-axioms from within an axiomatic system. Your approach to politic is to play within the sandbox that has been predefined for you. As long as you remain within that sandbox it is impossible to make any meaningful progress toward addressing root issues because the root of the issues reside specifically outside of the predefined playground

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your inability to make this connection leaves you talking in circles about insignificant and contrived issues that operate under the axiomatic hierarchy you refuse to address

Sorry, I don't take advice on culture war issues from crabs who prefer the bucket.

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shame you can't shitpost anywhere but this dead forum nobody in their right mind ever reads though.

Does the yonder tower
Long turned black green with moss and age,
Crumbled
Half down to a broken beam,
And there is no path to it,
Still not speak of the ancient people of our past
The Druids?

[Stonehenge model descends]

[Homesteaded]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not running into squat. I come here by choice and I will leave by choice. I'm not here to befriend the right, I am here to attack it. Tell yourself I am surprised by your hateful reactions if it suits you, just more running off with the wrong takeaway rather than a hard look in the mirror.

You sound like a rabid dog, a universally agreed upon asshole version of dog.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your view lacks the axiomatic precepts to address the issues you decry, though.

You presume to be a socialist who is against the concept of personal wealth and private property, yet the largest "occupying group" of this group is Jewish, which you refuse to acknowledge (deliberately).

Your inability to make this connection leaves you talking in circles about insignificant and contrived issues that operate under the axiomatic hierarchy you refuse to address

Wherefore, if not for, Joe Lieberman?