![]() |
|
#431
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#432
|
||||
|
Quote:
I was sort of indulging your question, but if I had to answer it earnestly that would be my answer. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#433
|
||||
|
Quote:
You deep state? | |||
|
|
||||
|
#434
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, if there’s a guy pointing a gun at your head and not firing, that person is showing restraint. Maybe do the same with your rifle. Or, better yet, don’t LARP a vigilante tough guy with a rifle and avoid completely obvious foreseeable consequences of doing so. Kyle should’ve been fucking his girlfriend or doing homework, how you guys think minors have the right to police the streets is absolutely mind boggling.
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | |||
|
Last edited by Patriam1066; 09-21-2020 at 11:14 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#435
|
|||
|
They don't and that's not what he did but sweet strawman as always.
Rittenhouse acting in self defense = murderer; cops acting in self defense = murderers and also fascists or something. Please detail, specifically, the conditions under which you are permitted to defend your life with a firearm. Like I just want to see what you guys think about this without any kind of dick measuring horseshit | ||
|
|
|||
|
#436
|
|||
|
A 17 year old who travels somewhere with a gun to play a vigilante doesn’t have any rights
Do not incentivize violence on american streets my man, if someone had attacked his home that’s entirely different. He made bad choices and they have consequences. Sadly, fatal consequences. He might’ve killed a pedophile and god knows who else, but he could not have known that. What he should’ve known, at a time when people are enraged enough to burn shit down for no reason, is that he just might be attacked going to riots alone with a rifle. He bears AT LEAST some minimal level of responsibility for the deaths of others, there’s no way in hell this is clear cut self defense So far as I’m concerned, no male 17 year old has any right to have a firearm absent chinese invasion of the United States with martial law imposed by a Mormon imperator, or on a family hunting trip I don’t know all of the laws of Wisconsin and Illinois about traveling across state lines and bearing arms as a minor, but I’m guessing he doesn’t have any legally enshrined rights to kill with a firearm without a high school diploma, and without some type of law enforcement training. I could be wrong, but morally I think he will answer to the man upstairs and I can’t imagine being dumb enough to not see how what he was doing might end up going bad I have a CHL in Texas. I personally do not carry most of the time because this Wild West shoot em up bull shit view in society is just bad. Taking a life is very consequential and I don’t think you guys appreciate that enough. How would you feel if you killed someone as a kid? I can only imagine I’d puke my guts out and probably cry as hard as I’d ever done when my mother looked upon me in shame. It’s sad that Kyle has no shame, and frankly, no God. He is an unrepentant sinner, he is lost
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | ||
|
|
|||
|
#437
|
|||
|
Cool, so I mean, if you live in a neighborhood known to be riddled with crime and somebody accosts you on the street and you shoot them, you have to be somewhat guilty of murder! I mean, you knew the risks of choosing to live in a bad neighborhood even though you didn't have to.
Nobody would give a flying shit about this case if skateboard man had tackled him and killed him. There is a glaringly obvious bias against him being spun by media. Again I reiterate: Under what circumstances is somebody permitted to defend themselves with lethal force? It's a very straightforward question. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#438
|
|||
|
If skateboard jew pedophile killed him I would’ve cared. And yes, I as a propertied male can defend things on my street with lethal force if required.
If Kyle or his father (I seriously doubt he has one in the home), had property on that street and it was threatened, this is very different
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | ||
|
|
|||
|
#439
|
|||
|
Okay, so I guess if you're defending somebody else's street, it's okay to get killed by a skateboard man who you did not provoke and who assaults you?
You skillfully dodged the central question yet again: Under what circumstances is somebody permitted to defend themselves with lethal force? You need to delineate this and still have not. You need to own property? Well uh, my living human body is kinda my property and I quite object to anybody trying to take it from me when I have not aggressed toward them. I award you several thousand troll points if you're going this deep. Also yikes about the "jew" thing you dropped. Wtf? History will always reveal the creepy weirdos who had to shake their fists at the sky and scream "god damn jews!" | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|