So that's it for the election.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's "en garde." If you want to translate the French to English, then it's "on your guard."

On guard is what you do for a living.

Lol its too easy!

[Daldolma]

You're unraveling. You seem unhappy in life.

[Alawen]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're unraveling. You seem unhappy in life.

So PhD in psych then?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're unraveling. You seem unhappy in life.

LOLOLOLOLOL Guy without any logical response attacks happiness?

[Alawen]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOLOLOLOLOL Guy without any logical response attacks happiness?

He's about three posts away from "U MAD BRO???????"

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He's about three posts away from "U MAD BRO???????"

Nah, you're not mad. Not self aware enough. Just pathetic.

[Splorf22]

Just to chime in, because I love a good flamewar (and I do have a PhD) appeal to scientific consensus is still appeal to authority. I don't know how familiar you are with the peer review process Daldoma, but it often ends up with highly . . . well, for lack of a better word, highly inbred ideas. Big Gun Professor X has some theories, his graduate students do work in those areas. Eventually they graduate and do their own research, and they will have similar theories and publish in similar conferences and journals. Worse, they will go into government funding agencies like the NSF and only fund research they think is promising which will usually be somewhat in line with their ideas (newsflash: all great ideas seem dumb to the current community. Of course, so do all dumb ideas).

Scientific consensus is frequently wrong. At one point 'all of the experts' believed that:

* the sun revolved around the earth
* the earth moved through a mysterious aether
* fat makes you fat
* humans are causing global warming

In other words if you want to prove Jesus was a historical figure, you can't just quote the experts. Its not as worthless as Alawen is making it out of course, but in the end you have to cite facts.

[Lucky]

Global warming fraud exposed

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Hasbinlulz]

Originally Posted by Lucky [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Global warming fraud exposed

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That graph is misleading.

[Splorf22]

Actually that graph is pretty reasonable. If you look up the 10k graph from ice core data you will find it impossible to believe in anthropogenic global warming.

If you think about it a bit, while global warming itself is science, anthropogenic global warming is basically a religion, because it is also unfalsifiable.