Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Toxigen]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM is the reason kittens cant win a vulak

Also that malopractice had me rolling. Good stuff.

[Troxx]

I’ll say it again the intent behind trolling is to simply cause a fuss. The troll does not have any interest in the subject at hand other than to get people worked up. No other goal exists other than the reactionary response of others (typically otherS plural).

That is a very different thing than stepping back and laughing at an idiot for being an idiot (and pointing it out).

I’m not trolling you DSM. I was actually interested in this discussion. If you read from the start you will see that I was summoned here BY NAME because people know I parse a ton and have a level 60 mage.

So no, not trolling. There isn’t any pleasure in it. Your autistic behavior and responses are far too PREDICTABLE and ultimately boil down to calling people trolls and “thanking” them for “conceding” when no concession was given.

If you’re tired of being laughed at, perhaps try being less … you?

You are the laughing stock of this community.

[bcbrown]

You said he was trolling, he was hurt by your accusations, and he was clearly not trolling.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You said he was trolling, he was hurt by your accusations, and he was clearly not trolling.

Troxx also just said he isn't trolling:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5220

Do you agree with Troxx that he isn't trolling?

[Zuranthium]

Jesus christ you people are still going on and on, when 4 mages is definitely the best group ever. I will let you all in on a secret to end this discussion: if there are exactly 4 mages in a party and each summons a pet of different element type, the game treats it as if each pet is all 4 pets at the same time. All of their HP, AC, regen, spells, resistances, and attack rounds, all of it, added together. So you get 4 pets doing up to 16 attacks per round, spamming stun and root, having huge damage shields and being generally unkillable. You're welcome.

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Jesus christ you people are still going on and on, when 4 mages is definitely the best group ever. I will let you all in on a secret to end this discussion: if there are exactly 4 mages in a party and each summons a pet of different element type, the game treats it as if each pet is all 4 pets at the same time. All of their HP, AC, regen, spells, resistances, and attack rounds, all of it, added together. So you get 4 pets doing up to 16 attacks per round, spamming stun and root, having huge damage shields and being generally unkillable. You're welcome.

mage pets are unclassically nerfed on p99

unclassic low pet dmg, unclassic agro, when a pet dies the mage gets 100% of all the agro that the pet generated and it's very difficult to get mobs to agro other targets if nothing else was close to the pet's total agro number

[bcbrown]

You said "You have no evidence to suggest I call people who disagree with me trolls." and I provided that evidence, when you called Jimjam a troll for disagreeing with you.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You said "You have no evidence to suggest I call people who disagree with me trolls." and I provided that evidence, when you called Jimjam a troll for disagreeing with you.

And you still don't have evidence. I disagree with your assessment of what happened in that exchange. Your bias by claiming "please stop trolling" is biting someone's head off is apparent.

You dodged my question about Troxx, as it makes a point that is relevant to the exchange with Jimjam.

Do you agree with Troxx's self assessment that he is not trolling?

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5220

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And you still don't have evidence. I disagree with your assessment of what happened in that exchange.

If you think Jimjam was trolling in that exchange, your definition is clearly grossly distorted, and I'm satisfied that will be clear to any disinterested party.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you think Jimjam was trolling in that exchange, your definition is clearly grossly distorted, and I'm satisfied that will be clear to any disinterested party.

It's actually quite easy to see who's definition is grossly distorted. Let's find some common ground on who we think is a troll.

Lets start with Troxx. Let it be noted he did admit to being a troll, and he admitted seeing other trolls too:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=114

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look guys, I’m an honest fella. I will readily admit to having engaged in trolling behavior with regards to DSM. You all have functioning brain cells … so I know that you all already know this. I also know that many of you also have done this. I’m not apologetic in the slightest sense of the word either.

Let it also be noted that Bcbrown consistently dodges the question about whether or not Troxx is a troll, and I've never seen Bcbrown call Troxx out for this.

Can you explain why you think Troxx is or is not a Troll?

You aren't going to convince people they should listen to you about what the definition of a troll is if you keep dodging this question, especially when Troxx has admitted to being a troll.