the i dont care about politics anymore thread

[Jobaber]

Originally Posted by Basanos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's put it this way. The legal system is designed to protect rich people like him from the top down.

is it the legal system, the president, or the media and voters that are protecting hunter biden?

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Jobaber [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

is it the legal system, the president, or the media and voters that are protecting hunter biden?

I think it's that the only people who care about whatever stupid shit Tucker said last night are already guaranteed GOP votes?

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tucker

Everybody drink!

[misterbonkers]

Originally Posted by Jobaber [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

is it the legal system, the president, or the media and voters that are protecting hunter biden?

what does he need protection from?

[Basanos]

Originally Posted by Jobaber [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

is it the legal system, the president, or the media and voters that are protecting hunter biden?

Bit of the first three. I doubt most Biden voters particularly care if he gets ignored OR hauled off to jail.

Team sports politics makes you crazy. Fuck 'em all. Imprison him, do nothing, Hunter Biden isn't the real problem in America. Like Trump, his impunity is a symptom, not a problem in and of itself. Kissinger still walks free, he's way worse than any of these goobers.

The root problems are still the excesses of capitalism and the (deliberate) political illiteracy of the average American.

[Jobaber]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what does he need protection from?

5 year mandatory min x 5 for possession

His own father argued in favor of that bill

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Jobaber [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

5 year mandatory min x 5 for possession

His own father argued in favor of that bill

Video isn't beyond a reasonable doubt for possession. No collusion.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what does he need protection from?

Trellxer or some other GOPtard furious about the last few elections doing his best impression of the Bear Jew from Inglourious Basterds?

[Jobaber]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Video isn't beyond a reasonable doubt for possession. No collusion.

-white privilege

Is video evidence enough to convict the defendant? As long as the evidence is admissible in court and provides incriminating proof, the answer is generally “yes”. However, it must provide answers to several questions, including the identity of the person on the tape and what crime has been committed.

[Basanos]

Originally Posted by Jobaber [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

5 year mandatory min x 5 for possession

His own father argued in favor of that bill

Yeah man orange man said drain the swamp and filled it with radioactive waste. Politicians are fulla shit, once you obtain the office there's no obligation to fulfill campaign promises. Sure, might only matter if you seek re-election. Then you just tell a different set of lies or have your PR people cook up excuses. Or, like Donnie, make sure all of your followers are fools.

Liberals make this mistake. They point out hypocrisy of some right winger cross dressing as he outlaws cross dressing. Like, fellas, only you care about their hypocrisy. Hypocrisy alone is insufficient to stop people, obviously.