******Official politics thread ******

[bigjerry]

Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Prove it.

google the young turks genius

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just trying to help you out grampa. blaming it directly on skin color is some old timey racism. in current year you're supposed to grunt something about culture when expressing that opinion.

you need to brush up your memes my good chum

I feel like this guy gets me

[maerilith]

Originally Posted by bigjerry [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

google the young turks genius

Didn't he interview with the young Turks? Or something. Some conservative show, talking about this in a legit and open way?

I'm pretty sure I know what your talking about. Honestly I don't know though. I've taken a break from my duties as a fact checker. Especially since I tend to be ignored like most women who speak up for themselves.

[maerilith]

Originally Posted by Angushjalmur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the first hallmark of privilege is that you cannot recognize your own

Attempting to tell it like it is.

#privileged2017

Honestly, I am gratified you took the effort to read my posts and respond in a thoughtful way. I am privileged indeed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[maskedmelon]

Best solution to matters of civil liberty is law. Yeah, we got off course with laws for a while, but we fixed that in 1964. What we need is for government to mandate where people live, but not so completely that it interferes with people's choices. What we could do is have a national housing database.

We wouldn't want it to be too inefficient so it would be good to keep with the states and local municipalities, but ultimately other locations would need access to the info and local governments can't be relied upon to act in the best interest of other unrelated local governments, so ultimately it would have to be federally managed

Then people could just submit applications for where they wanted to live and the government would match them with the closest openings based on their ethnicity so that we could make sure there was no segregation and every square mile of developed space was properly balanced between penis and vagina and black and white and yellow and brown.

Not everyone can afford to live where they want though and sometimes you end up with a situation where one area is becoming overly saturated with a particular group, so we'd need some form of government assistance to help people's relocate to more diverse areas. That cost would be shared between the recipient, the locality they are leaving, the one they are moving to and the federal government.

[maerilith]

Originally Posted by Angushjalmur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can't wait to see what the liberals say if they manage to get rid of trump and get mike "ride the lightning" pence in his stead.

He's the one you should be worried about, and that's why trump picked him. He's the neutron bomb connected to the political deadman trigger

they were dumb enough to get sucked in to this obvious nwo plot that is modern progressivism though, doesnt surprise me they cant see the forest for the trees.

Well I can agree. But I also think NWO globalization ness isn't something we should try to halt at any cost to civilization.

We need to push ourselves into the next age and take advantage of our resources responsibly and with consideration for others and our environment.

[maerilith]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Best solution to matters of civil liberty is law. Yeah, we got off course with laws for a while, but we fixed that in 1964. What we need is for government to mandate where people live, but not so completely that it interferes with people's choices. What we could do is have a national housing database.

We wouldn't want it to be too inefficient so it would be good to keep with the states and local municipalities, but ultimately other locations would need access to the info and local governments can't be relied upon to act in the best interest of other unrelated local governments, so ultimately it would have to be federally managed

Then people could just submit applications for where they wanted to live and the government would match them with the closest openings based on their ethnicity so that we could make sure there was no segregation and every square mile of developed space was properly balanced between penis and vagina and black and white and yellow and brown.

Not everyone can afford to live where they want though and sometimes you end up with a situation where one area is becoming overly saturated with a particular group, so we'd need some form of government assistance to help people's relocate to more diverse areas. That cost would be shared between the recipient, the locality they are leaving, the one they are moving to and the federal government.

That's a bad idea and the part of progressive affirmative action that I don't agree with.

You can't fix the south with liberal shenanigans like that. It won't save anyone or anything because we can't make people get along or treat other people fairly. Or do their part.

The best we can do is ensure that someone has a fair chance with education, employment, and criminal justice regardless of who or what they are or have in common / difference.

Ppl should be fired / hired based on merits and work ethic. Not ethnicity, religion, or what's on their bedsheets. Or which waifu they are married to.

The government shouldn't elevate one group over another. Or allow our collective efforts to be exploited by any group or in support of any specific ideological point of view.

Enforcing intelligent behavior can be wasteful though [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Obama tried and while we made some progress, we ended up with a situation where people based on conspiracy and emotional distress aren't willing to work within their social contracts.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's a bad idea and the part of progressive affirmative action that I don't agree with.

You can't fix the south with liberal shenanigans like that. It won't save anyone or anything because we can't make people get along or treat other people fairly. Or do their part.

The best we can do is ensure that someone has a fair chance with education, employment, and criminal justice regardless of who or what they are or have in common / difference.

Ppl should be fired / hired based on merits and work ethic. Not ethnicity, religion, or what's on their bedsheets. Or which waifu they are married to.

The government shouldn't elevate one group over another. Or allow our collective efforts to be exploited by any group or in support of any specific ideological point of view.

Enforcing intelligent behavior can be wasteful though [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Obama tried and while we made some progress, we ended up with a situation where people based on conspiracy and emotional distress aren't willing to work within their social contracts.

Good stuff ^^

[bigjerry]

Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Didn't he interview with the young Turks? Or something. Some conservative show, talking about this in a legit and open way?

I'm pretty sure I know what your talking about. Honestly I don't know though. I've taken a break from my duties as a fact checker. Especially since I tend to be ignored like most women who speak up for themselves.

maybe no-one listens to u cuz ur quest for wisdom and self-actualization is secondary to ur quest to be someone's battered wife [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] if you want me to slap you around proper, give me a better target.

as for pokesan and that guy who melted down and admitted I had vanquished him in forum combat when Don was elected, I never said anything about skin color or culture. I said that "integrated" (segregated) cities are waaaay more violent and scarier to walk at night than homogenous ones. Which happens to be factual.

check the stats and dunk me on my actual argument if you dare!

of course this starts to lead you down grandpa cliche roads when you realize that homogenous brown cities are still almost universally shitholes and you have to come up with an explanation better than "whites are omnipotent oppressors" when you see that Asian countries don't seem to be suffering, but I can't really help that. I don't have so much disdain for paternal wisdom that being called ojisan stings me anyway (not raised by single mother).

[bigjerry]

Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's a bad idea and the part of progressive affirmative action that I don't agree with.

You can't fix the south with liberal shenanigans like that. It won't save anyone or anything because we can't make people get along or treat other people fairly. Or do their part.

The best we can do is ensure that someone has a fair chance with education, employment, and criminal justice regardless of who or what they are or have in common / difference.

Ppl should be fired / hired based on merits and work ethic. Not ethnicity, religion, or what's on their bedsheets. Or which waifu they are married to.

The government shouldn't elevate one group over another. Or allow our collective efforts to be exploited by any group or in support of any specific ideological point of view.

Enforcing intelligent behavior can be wasteful though [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Obama tried and while we made some progress, we ended up with a situation where people based on conspiracy and emotional distress aren't willing to work within their social contracts.

nice platitudes that literally nobody disagrees with