Raid Suspension: The Mystical Order

[Rellapse40]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ambrotos]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have no idea about some past ruling by you. I honestly don't know what you're talking about in your first sentence. I'm referring to a practice that occurs in Fear every single time CT spawns. When guild A's bard picks up a fear train, the guilds B's bard has to find, and bracer him. So that when guild B engages CT before guild A, guild B can have control over guild A's train. If guild B does not steal guild A's train. Then guild A will WC cap and drop the train, causing guild B to wipe. This is how CT engage has worked for like 3 years at least and is well within the accepted rules. How do you now know about this?

I've known this. It was never a requirement for guild b bard to have to do it. That's smart and prevents guild a from wiping guild b out. Back when the no training ruls use was made the staff sent have access to the encounter logs. It was hard to say who wiped who or had fte on cazic.

Even so if guild a bard has the train and made it and then caps out when guild b engages, he is still responsible for the train. It was ruled in the past by Rogean and one other time. So saying it's been always acceptable isn't correct. Now if Sirken is doing it differently then sure.

But as always if a person has a train they are responsible for what it does. There is no leeway.

[Ambrotos]

Fuck auto spell. Damn cell phones

[Strifer]

Originally Posted by Rellapse40 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Dragonsblood1987]

Originally Posted by Rellapse40 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you at a family reunion or something?

[Lopretni]

Doesn't everyone get eaten out by their grandpa every morning? Uh-oh...

[pufen]

plot twist: I eat out my grandpa. He's post-op

[Dragonsblood1987]

^ getting moist

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've known this. It was never a requirement for guild b bard to have to do it. That's smart and prevents guild a from wiping guild b out. Back when the no training ruls use was made the staff sent have access to the encounter logs. It was hard to say who wiped who or had fte on cazic.

Even so if guild a bard has the train and made it and then caps out when guild b engages, he is still responsible for the train. It was ruled in the past by Rogean and one other time. So saying it's been always acceptable isn't correct. Now if Sirken is doing it differently then sure.

But as always if a person has a train they are responsible for what it does. There is no leeway.

...But it's literally impossible to control the train when CT is aggroed. It's going to rush to whoever CT has/had aggro on. It's going to run straight to him. How do you expect it to be controlled? Furthermore, if you see a guild trying to rush past you (and you're controlling the kite) you're fucking right i'm gonna go more northeast to give them less dps time. Growth is going to be an even bigger mess :3

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Furthermore, by pure accident, one of the class R guilds was killing a summoning mob during our CT engage. It made the fight extremely difficult and we just barely wiped. When CT spawns are guilds no longer allowed to damage trash or can we just keep a few mobs at 90% parked for when IB goes for a CT on repop?