Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2024, 09:00 PM
bcbrown bcbrown is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 761
Default

I just did in the post just above that you refuse to address. If I was playing a shaman, that enchanter would have died.

Surely you're not going to ask me to prove that a groupmate dieing will result in fewer kills/hour?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2024, 09:06 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just did in the post just above that you refuse to address. If I was playing a shaman, that enchanter would have died.

Surely you're not going to ask me to prove that a groupmate dieing will result in fewer kills/hour?
You are assuming the Enchanter would have died. Shamans could Slow, root, or heal in that situation to keep the Enchanter alive. Malo may have prevented the situation too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2024, 09:11 PM
bcbrown bcbrown is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 761
Default

It's ok to admit that there are some scenarios where a cleric can keep an enchanter alive where a shaman wouldn't have been able to do so.

The enchanter was at 60% in the blink of an eye. It would have taken a second or two just to figure out who was aggroed on him - no time for stuns or roots. If I was chain-casting greater healing like a shaman he would have died.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2024, 09:12 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's ok to admit that there are some scenarios where a cleric can keep an enchanter alive where a shaman wouldn't have been able to do so.

The enchanter was at 60% in the blink of an eye. It would have taken a second or two just to figure out who was aggroed on him - no time for stuns or roots. If I was chain-casting greater healing like a shaman he would have died.
It's ok to admit a Shaman could have saved the situation too. Heals are not your only tool for charm breaks, and Malo could have prevented it.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 07-01-2024 at 09:15 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2024, 09:22 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You can Torpor tank and cast other spells:
It's easy to say this, but Mr. Murphy always tends to visit at the worst possible moment, like when you're already getting low on health, your Torpor just got interrupted and you miscast something else without noticing. That's when charm breaks. This game is simple but not easy, and when shit goes south it happens very quickly. Pretending that you have the same ability to quickly and effectively react to a charm break on a tanking Shaman versus a medding Cleric is completely asinine, but par for the course for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Heals are not your only tool for charm breaks. Malo could have prevented it.
This is literally akin to saying, "You don't need a seat beat in a crash, because safe driving could have prevented it." The problem is that the frequency of charm breaks is less important than your ability to quickly react to them. Because they are inevitable and will happen numerous times per play session even while using Malo. And a Cleric does a MUCH better job at assisting an Enchanter with a charm break than a Shaman.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2024, 09:20 PM
bcbrown bcbrown is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 761
Default

Charm will always break, but it's not just charm breaks. Sometimes there's a bad pull. Sometimes there's bad timing on repops in camp. Sometimes there's a train.

There's situations where rapid-fire blast healing is necessary, and a cleric is better in those situations. I gave you an actual real-world example where a shaman's healing would be insufficient.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2024, 09:50 PM
Duik Duik is offline
Planar Protector

Duik's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Near the largest canyon in the world!
Posts: 2,971
Default

Shaman/Enchanter/Monk work well because a monk doesnt have the hitpoints of a well chosen charm pet so ya pathetic (in compariison to cleric) heals will do.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2024, 10:05 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Shaman/Enchanter/Monk work well because a monk doesnt have the hitpoints of a well chosen charm pet so ya pathetic (in compariison to cleric) heals will do.
Last time I checked there is an enchanter in the group. They do indeed have a fully kitted out charmed pet in this combo, and the Shaman keeps the party alive just fine.

The normal Fungi King setup is an Enchanter with a hasted/torched froggie pet, a Torpor Shaman, and a Monk puller. The Torpor Shaman slows, tanks, heals, and malos, and the Pet/Monk hit the mob from behind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretending that you have the same ability to quickly and effectively react to a charm break on a tanking Shaman
I've done it before. Remember that you didn't understand the Shaman is tanking instead of the enchanter pet just a few posts ago. You thought the Shaman was Torporing a tanking pet. It is not suprising you wouldn't know this either.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 07-01-2024 at 10:27 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2024, 10:32 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've done it before. Remember that you didn't understand the Shaman is tanking instead of the enchanter pet just a few posts ago. You thought the Shaman was Torporing a tanking pet. It is not suprising you wouldn't know this either.
I understand that perfectly well. I also understand there are plenty of times when you WON'T be Torpor tanking, like the entirety of levels 1-59, for example.

The Cleric, meanwhile, is completely mogging you with his 20pp CH spell from level 39.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The normal Fungi King setup is an Enchanter with a hasted/torched froggie pet, a Torpor Shaman, and a Monk puller. The Torpor Shaman slows, tanks, heals, and malos, and the Pet/Monk hit the mob from behind.
The fact that every fucking example you toss out is either Fungi King or WW dragons will never not be hilarious.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2024, 10:53 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I understand that perfectly well. I also understand there are plenty of times when you WON'T be Torpor tanking, like the entirety of levels 1-59, for example.

The Cleric, meanwhile, is completely mogging you with his 20pp CH spell from level 39.


The fact that every fucking example you toss out is either Fungi King or WW dragons will never not be hilarious.
I provide examples, and you don't. Glad I could teach you a few things about Shamans today!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.