![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
please don't stop responding, alarti is lonely. this is his only social interaction. RIP online dating profile
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Couldn't have been hard - apparently he has a long and rich history of obsessing over things on the internet that don't concern him.
__________________
Impotent Rage - 60 Ranger
Knifeknight - 43 Rogue Yumyums Inmahtumtums - 60 Enchanter *RETIRED* | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Why are we only at 57 pages? Someone needs to start arguing pointlessly back and forth so that we can get this thread going places.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Impotent Rage - 60 Ranger
Knifeknight - 43 Rogue Yumyums Inmahtumtums - 60 Enchanter *RETIRED* | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
how to handle raid disputes:
1) assign numbers to each side involved 2) /random 3) ban whoever wins benefits: * transparent, consistent judgment * the facts of the case that everyone always quibbles about won't matter * endless cries of gm corruption will be limited to faked /random messages * disproportionately risky for bigger guilds -- they have more to lose make petitioning the worst available option for everyone, right or wrong, big or small could probably even automate it; win-win | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Well this could have all been prevented if you played on red.
__________________
Gobble?
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Soooo evidence was given to the GM's about TMO training... TMO gets suspended.
Another GM temporarily unsuspended TMO, then reinstated the suspension because he didn't want to go against the ruling without the other GM being there. Right? Where is TMO's evidence that they didn't train?
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|