![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
And i agree the lower levels the community is great,even some of the higher levels are great,it's just the pixel lust that you see make me sick.
__________________
The views and ramblings of Gummab are in no way the views of Europa as a guild
Gummab 60Shaman Talomin 60Rogue Cazoo 57Monk Grummab 54Warrior Ebroma 52Ranger Sickbag 20Cleric | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
I just think that this proposal opens up many targets for everyone considering they can (class b) still go after all mobs. From what I read it's a workable solution to non-rotation while giving all "raiding" guilds a chance to shine. I think a vast majority of people posting here didn't read it or are thinking that some kind of dark ages would be allowed to descend if it was agreed upon. If it works it works if it doesn't it doesn't. I read all 47 pages of replies and it gets real confusing in there... But it just looked feasible.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
read proposal. it opens things up, some good ideas.
my only warning is, the best rule sets get simpler, not more complex. so that is my two bits. to quote Ralph Waldo Emerson: "simplify, simplify, simplify." get the rules as simple as possible. otherwise, rule lawyering will make your head explode inside of two months. but good start. still think my proposal was and is the best. but I am of simple mind, to quote Luca Brasi
__________________
go go go
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
You are a single person who does not voice for a guild. We need guild leaders agreeing to this or disagreeing. This topic has gotten so offhand. TMO/FE put a lot of time into this, we need officers from guilds to agree/disagree to this. I was even part of the 'off topic'. Lets see what comes of this.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
This agreement = a few scraps for you guys And the rest of the time TMO and FE alternate kills on shit. Its fucking retarded, greedy, obnoxious and all of the people Ive spoken to are laughing at it. The only solution that works is a bag limit. Weight it any way you like to reward IB FE and TMO for already being keyed etc. Who cares. It scales in to velious VERY well. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not opposing you. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Lets just say it doesn work for "Category B' obviously. Maybe I misinterpret these posts, but from what I have seen there is negative reaction to this proposition. I myself oppose it, but I am not the voice of my guild.
The idea is to have the guild leaders/officers agree or disagree to this proposal or amend it. Maybe tomorrow we will see more light on this from guild representatives. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
The problem is, people in TMO, IB, and FE want ALL of the mobs.
Rogean does not want this Sirken does not want this Nilbog does not want this. Thus we can know that without being fair, instead of obnoxious dickwads wanting 70% of the mobs 75% of the time, we should instead share them 100% evenly with a bag limit, which sees tmo and ib going nuts for PD and co, and the rest of the server opened up. And once again, no coding changes, no intervention, and whokilledit.net means its self policing. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
What you guys seem to fail to realize is that we've been in Kunark so long now, we're actually about due for LDoN. Instances are in fact classic at this point.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|