Mages are up shit’s creek I guess

[saftbudet]

Selectively classic. Thats how P99 rolls. They deliberatly ignore some classic to make game more balanced.

I have no opinion in whether it is good or not. But they do.

[Obrae]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Listen, go eat shit Skorge. You're doing this to spite Mage players while feigning some kind of "Classic-purist benevolence."

You've advocated in post after post, lobbying for every Mage NERF, whilst conveniently ignoring every
Classic change that would increase their strength.

In fact lets get you and Dolalin a corner and y'all two can just take turns defecating in each other's mouth!

To the defense of Dolalin i don't think he does in out of spite. He did took time to help us get the chain of pet corrected.

[keithjinternet]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Listen, go eat shit Skorge. You're doing this to spite Mage players while feigning some kind of "Classic-purist benevolence."

You've advocated in post after post, lobbying for every Mage NERF, whilst conveniently ignoring every
Classic change that would increase their strength.

In fact lets get you and Dolalin a corner and y'all two can just take turns defecating in each other's mouth!

What did they nerf that should have been in for launch of green as it relates to mages?

[cd288]

Originally Posted by skorge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Extensive research? Homie found this research within a day after I posted this: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=335510

Check out how the forums responded, nobody listened. Baler tried his hardest to derail my thread. You neckbeards were warned, nobody listened. You are also lucky pets can cast spells at all.

You want to play a mage? Deal with how it was in classic. I personally had the time of my life playing mage (1-24) from March - May 99. Grouped the most I've ever grouped, got to meet tons of cool people. Verant wanted to make EQ as much as a grouping experience as possible. That may just be why mages functioned the way they did at launch (aka "broke" to most of you sour patches here).

Nobody listened because it was coming from you

[Obrae]

Originally Posted by skorge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Extensive research? Homie found this research within a day after I posted this: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=335510

Check out how the forums responded, nobody listened. Baler tried his hardest to derail my thread. You neckbeards were warned, nobody listened. You are also lucky pets can cast spells at all.

You want to play a mage? Deal with how it was in classic. I personally had the time of my life playing mage (1-24) from March - May 99. Grouped the most I've ever grouped, got to meet tons of cool people. Verant wanted to make EQ as much as a grouping experience as possible. That may just be why mages functioned the way they did at launch (aka "broke" to most of you sour patches here).

Dude i would much rather have release pet damage than spells. You never played release eq it shows.

[Obrae]

Zodium gif is freaking hilarious btw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ligma]

You losers are still in this bitch screaming 'witch hunt!' LUL

[Valion]

Originally Posted by Ligma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You losers are still in this bitch screaming 'witch hunt!' LUL

All most as sad as people like you still trolling it LOL

[Jimjam]

The thing about 'selectively classic' is you document your case for what you think is classic, and if the dev's approve and can work out how to implement it then that will probably happen.

Selectively classic doesn't mean you get to whine for 44 pages in attempt to create pressure for non classic features.

If you want a say in non-classic tweaks your best bet is to volunteer as a dev instead of player / forum service user.

Otherwise find out the by level hit tables for release pets to get a sense of their dmg, find their average hits to get a sense of their attack and present it neatly in the appropriate forum.

Also stop projecting this insane 'people are trying to nerf mages to their release form to spite me'. All it does is create the impression that your thought processes revolve around boosting your favourite classes and nerfing the ones you don't like. P1999 isn't about fixing classic everquest. It is experimental archeology - practically recreating the past using limited data.

[Gorster]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The thing about 'selectively classic' is you document your case for what you think is classic, and if the dev's approve and can work out how to implement it then that will probably happen.

Selectively classic doesn't mean you get to whine for 44 pages in attempt to create pressure for non classic features.

If you want a say in non-classic tweaks your best bet is to volunteer as a dev instead of player / forum service user.

Otherwise find out the by level hit tables for release pets to get a sense of their dmg, find their average hits to get a sense of their attack and present it neatly in the appropriate forum.

Also stop projecting this insane 'people are trying to nerf mages to their release form to spite me'. All it does is create the impression that your thought processes revolve around boosting your favourite classes and nerfing the ones you don't like. P1999 isn't about fixing classic everquest. It is experimental archeology - practically recreating the past using limited data.