![]() |
|
#391
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#392
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#393
|
|||
|
It isn't about just eating the suspension either. I don't mind a week off from raiding. It's about the precedent this particular situation would set that makes you liable for the aggro other guilds build on mobs simply because their FTE message was the first to go off in a zone with 6 dragons in it. It's so easy to manipulate and get another guild banned by this precedent.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#394
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#396
|
|||
|
Yea, I'm fine with a week off from VP. Hell I'd fine with a week off in general if it was our choice and IB didn't benefit from it. Class R VP week, lets do it.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#397
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#398
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#399
|
||||
|
Quote:
I didn't need to admit to anything Ambrotos, they have the logs, and you can even see our trainer die in the fraps. It's visible on Bandito's chat log for some reason. Everyone knew that our train up had been killed. It was really asked more as a rhetorical question, to make a point. I still disagree with it and it's a very dangerous precedent. It means that if someone else pulls a dragon and you pull a dragon immediately following that, that the first guild needs to keep agro and move it for ever, and the second guild doesn't have to do shit about it. I don't see how or why this should be any different than a plane of fear kite. If you are pulling a dragon, you should find the train and take responsibility for it. And the other guild shouldn't be forced to keep it occupied indefinitely while you kill the dragon for free. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#400
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yet their bad calls at zone in by Hokushin walked Hoshkar all the way to zone in and trained 2 raids. I am going to enjoy this new precedent set by the GM's though. Wait until IB is about ready to pull and aggro another dragon first FTW. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|