8/1 to 8/3 Draco window

[Atmas]

Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ironic like a black fly in my lemonade? Or Ironic like TMO wavering back and forth between acting like elitist tough guys and saying they are approachable for negotiations?

Ironic like Sansa Stark looking forward to living in King's Landing because she thought it would be filled with chivalrous knights.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well actually, it was for comedic value... I wasn't actually calling any individual stupid. However, you are pretty stupid if you think that BDA or any other guild not in the "tmo fold" would ever try to conduct meaningful dialogue with a guild that is actively breaking server rules on a nightly basis.

The TMO Fold is growing, guess that means guilds not in the fold "conducted meaningful dialogue" with us at some point.

Troll Smarter not Harder!

[Harazzer]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The TMO Fold is growing, guess that means guilds not in the fold "conducted meaningful dialogue" with us at some point.

Troll Smarter not Harder!

Yea you took enraptured, a guild that was struggling to kill ragefire, and handed them a ton of loot. I would certainly put that more in the area of either prostitution or subjugation before any sort of diplomatic union.

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by India [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When did TMO agree to this? Ohhhh they didn't you say? I see, yet you expect them to abide by a random post on a forum by a guild (BDA) who's most verbal forum members hate TMO ...

RIGHT! Got it!



Had BDA actually consulted TMO about this decision things may have turned out differently. As it stands though, BDA made this decision on their own without consulting, asking, or talking to TMO.

Silly BDA

explain the difference between this attempt and these attempts...

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=72501

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=71477

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

explain the difference between this attempt and these attempts...

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=72501

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=71477

we were informing the server we werent killing dragons. Sanluen informed the server that TMO and BDA wouldnt be killing dragons without consulting TMO.

You made this post after the other was deleted trying to save face after a significant portion of the server was educated differently by San.

Any more questions?

[quido]

"You want to learn the first rule you'd know if you'd ever spent a day in your life? You never open your mouth til you know what the shot is. You fucking child." - Ricky Roma

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

we were informing the server we werent killing dragons. Sanluen informed the server that TMO and BDA wouldnt be killing dragons without consulting TMO.

You made this post after the other was deleted trying to save face after a significant portion of the server was educated differently by San.

Any more questions?

Instead it was instances of:

TMO offering up a dragon to the casuals expecting VD to stand down on it as well.

BDA offering up a dragon to the casuals expecting TMO to stand down on it as well.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Instead it was instances of:

TMO offering up a dragon to the casuals expecting VD to stand down on it as well.

BDA offering up a dragon to the casuals expecting TMO to stand down on it as well.

BDA said TMO agreed.

TMO said VD couldn't go for them or TMO would kill them.

It's not the same thing, obviously.

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BDA said TMO agreed.

TMO said VD couldn't go for them or TMO would kill them.

It's not the same thing, obviously.

BDA never said TMO agreed. TMO was suspended from interracting with that Draco, but then it was repealed. BDA was giving it up to the casuals since we knew TMO / enraptured couldnt touch it. Cuz were nice. But after the repeal, we figured we would still let the casuals go for it since we said they could. TMO was never invited to the conversation. Just figured your generosity might demonstrate your greatness to those you mean to rule.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BDA never said TMO agreed. TMO was suspended from interracting with that Draco, but then it was repealed. BDA was giving it up to the casuals since we knew TMO / enraptured couldnt touch it. Cuz were nice. But after the repeal, we figured we would still let the casuals go for it since we said they could. TMO was never invited to the conversation. Just figured your generosity might demonstrate your greatness to those you mean to rule.

BDA said TMO wouldn't engage, but you never talked to them.

Perhaps before jumping in boats, one should make sure it's not riddled with holes.

Your plan failed not due to TMO's generosity (or lack of) but because you didn't think about the possibilities. Very weak foresight for a guild.

Also, I've seen where you guys wanted to kill that draco, if you had known it was up. However, you guys sat around with thumbs up your asses laughing thinking it wasn't, when it was, and TMO was mobilizing and then facepalming when someone finally confirmed it was up after TMO had 20 or so in the zone.

It must hurt, that TMO is more straight forward about what it will and won't do compared to BDA.