Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: should the server have a hands off/no rules policy?
yes, personal responsibility and playerbase solving own problems 29 60.42%
no, i am a moron and plan to vote for obama 19 39.58%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2012, 12:55 AM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Eve supports and condones griefing, and exploiting.

Not possible to compare Eve to EQ. Eve was designed for pure pvp. EQ added it after, with no regard to its implementation.
  #2  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:03 AM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ninjalooting, trade ganking, scamming, training, xp lossing, stranding warriors in hate and so on should. imo be approached with a hands off tough shit mindset as they were on sullon (and for all but training, on rz as well)

tired of seeing/hearing about the latest ruling on what is or is not allowed and the various shades of gray cast as a result, the only truly fair ruleset is no ruleset.
No, this is classic everquest not your personal torture chamber.

Keep it Classic
  #3  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:11 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palemoon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, this is classic everquest not your personal torture chamber.

Keep it Classic
everything i mentioned IS classic to have GMs not interfere.
  #4  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:18 AM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
everything i mentioned IS classic to have GMs not interfere.
Wrong and Nellodee/softcore PK already pointed all this out to you months ago.

You see what you want to see from behind your hannibal lecter mask.
  #5  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:19 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palemoon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wrong and Nellodee/softcore PK already pointed all this out to you months ago.

You see what you want to see from behind your hannibal lecter mask.
sorry, but i dont need morons from some carebear server to "correct" me

the only thing that was against the rules out of what i mentioned was training, and that was on RZ and everyone did it anyway.
  #6  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:23 AM
Null Null is offline
VIP / Contributor

Null's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
everything i mentioned IS classic to have GMs not interfere.
I have personally been banned or had guildies banned for everything on your list outside of stranding people in Hate. It didn't happen often, mostly because banning people meant losing revenue but it did happen.
  #7  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:28 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Null [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have personally been banned or had guildies banned for everything on your list outside of stranding people in Hate. It didn't happen often, mostly because banning people meant losing revenue but it did happen.
you also personally had red full resists on single effect nukes that never happened throughout the entire duration of launch through velious.

i have screenshots of ozuri (lead gm of RZ) squirreled away somewhere telling me tradeganking was legal after i shitcanned someone during a gbs "trade" in neriak for thousands of plat.

ninjalooting was a regular occurance on RZ among all of the raid sects and nobody ever got banned for it.

instead people were banned for things like "zoneline camping"
  #8  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:32 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

in fact the policies on such were clear.....

"scamming", if you willingly gave another player an item or your login you were shit out of luck

ninjalooting, was considered part of raid security to prevent it

tradeganking, you were expected to be careful and take precautions against it (gems for example)

training was the only thing i mentioned that got people a gm response, and even that did not apply on sullon.


your either full of shit, played long after sony took over the game or had GMs operating on a whole different set of rules on the (team?) server you played on.
  #9  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:11 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ninjalooting, trade ganking, scamming, training, xp lossing, stranding warriors in hate and so on should. imo be approached with a hands off tough shit mindset as they were on sullon (and for all but training, on rz as well)

tired of seeing/hearing about the latest ruling on what is or is not allowed and the various shades of gray cast as a result, the only truly fair ruleset is no ruleset.
TD;DR (too dumb; didn't read)
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #10  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:20 AM
Flunklesnarkin Flunklesnarkin is offline
Planar Protector

Flunklesnarkin's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Best America
Posts: 1,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ninjalooting, trade ganking, scamming, training, xp lossing, stranding warriors in hate and so on should. imo be approached with a hands off tough shit mindset as they were on sullon (and for all but training, on rz as well)

tired of seeing/hearing about the latest ruling on what is or is not allowed and the various shades of gray cast as a result, the only truly fair ruleset is no ruleset.


[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.