Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2011, 03:03 PM
Roanoke Roanoke is offline
Kobold

Roanoke's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
People actually played EQ2? But back then WoW didn't suck yet. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
EQ2 always seemed like an open world while WoW felt like a theme park. Granted I played WoW for a lot longer than EQ2 but I always enjoyed the latter much more for actual gameplay.
  #2  
Old 10-18-2011, 03:07 PM
Kika Maslyaka Kika Maslyaka is offline
Planar Protector

Kika Maslyaka's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,055
Default

from 2004 to 2005 competition between EQ2 and WoW was very fierce. Players kept going back and forth between the games as both side devs were tuning their game after initial bugginess. I know a guy who switched between the two at least 5 times [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Important point is, that WoW sticked to its original goal, while EQ2 kept trying to please everyone, including both original eq1 player and new comers, and at the end turned merely into shadow of its original glory.

I actually regret that i didn't tried wow during vanilla age. I played briefly a bit before WoLK, and I liked that specific era, but since then there were more and more changes I didn't liked at all.

WoW has some interesting base concepts that I like, like talent system, but IMHO they didn't utilized it right.

On the subject on pack-mobs in eq2 - they were non-spliteable, because they were a SINGLE encounter. So instead of giving you ONE big mob, they gave you 3-5 small ones. If you could split those, the encounter would no longer hold its original intended difficulty. (social mobs is a whole different thing all together here). And some classes were specifically build around ability to take down pack-mobs - like Warlock
Last edited by Kika Maslyaka; 10-18-2011 at 03:15 PM..
  #3  
Old 10-18-2011, 04:43 PM
Atmas Atmas is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In the bushes outside your window
Posts: 1,009
Default

I understood the role of the packed mobs I just didn't like how pre-packaged it made the encounters feel. I think all MMOs encounter many of the same problems and implement many of the same institutions but the small differences are what really draw in or deter users.

I played WoW near the launch, it was awesome. Especially the PvP before battlegrounds. I played EQ2 during one of my many breaks. I've played WoW on and off numerous times. The game is very well made as in comparison to how buggy so much of EQ and other MMOs have been. What I didn't/don't like about it is the need to please everyone no matter what their request. People play Paladins in EQ and accept that they are not going to top the charts in DPS. You try to tell that to people in WoW and they will QQ a river and eventually get their way.
__________________
60 Wixxor - Atmas
60 Paladin - Opmeter
54 Rogue - Ories
Some other toons
Formerly of TZ
  #4  
Old 10-18-2011, 05:55 PM
Kika Maslyaka Kika Maslyaka is offline
Planar Protector

Kika Maslyaka's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,055
Default

well Retribution paladins are suppose to be melee DPS =)
Holy paladins suppose to heal
etc
I would not expect Holy or Protection paly be able to dps
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.