![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
I think a lot of the "fun" of soloing a Warrior is just the feeling of accomplishment from doing something different and difficult. You can't throw a rock without hitting a Fungi Iksar Monk twink, but soloing a pimped out Wood Elf Warrior? You're definitely stylin' and profilin'. That being said, there's a reason Monks are far and away the preferred melee to solo with. It's just a much easier and more enjoyable experience with the Monk toolkit compared to the Warrior.
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I was having this same debate, leaning towards monk because I've already leveled a tank (pally) to 58 and never played a monk before. I have a very solid twink setup ready to go, just still considering a few things. Thinking about going eyepatch human and taking a leveling path through some of the dungeons I haven't really explored before.
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Pornstash ftw.
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Human Monk definitely the way to go if you've got a Fungi and other nice twink gear. The Iksar regen is enormously overrated (especially 1-50) and you'll level noticeably faster on the Human. Fashion is also obviously much better.
| ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now, if I was redesigning things, Human Monk unarmed attacks would have slightly higher base damage (and the Monk epic would add to unarmed damage rather than making the attacks weaker+faster). So in that case Human Monk would be slighter better DPS. Unfortunately it's not how things are, so there's no reason I'd pick a Human.
__________________
| |||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Iksar will obviously be a statistically superior character at 60, but the Human will get there quicker. | |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by Zuranthium; 07-27-2024 at 05:25 PM..
| ||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
So if you are in the 2kish hp ballpark at 51 we're talking 8 hp a tick. So counting mend the 51 iksar gets 25% more regen sitting, 16% standing. | |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
For a warrior does STR dictate the damage output on crits?
| ||
![]() |
|
|