Sleeper being awoken tonight (April 13th)

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who gives a shit about a manastone?

Do you always act this childish and stubborn when you're wrong?

Clearly basic logic goes over your head.

Both Sleeper and Manastone are limited time content. If you are fine with Manastone being limited time, you are also fine with Sleeper being limited time. Or are you going to complain that the Dev's are "loot denying" limited time content such as Manastone?

Also, who gives a shit about Warder loot?

Do you always act this childish and stubborn when you're wrong?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Clearly basic logic goes over your head.

Both Sleeper and Manastone are limited time content. If you are fine with Manastone being limited time, you are also fine with Sleeper being limited time. Or are you going to complain that the Dev's are "loot denying" limited time content such as Manastone?

Also, who gives a shit about Warder loot?

Do you always act this childish and stubborn when you're wrong?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Devs remove Sleeper?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Devs remove Sleeper?

No, that isn't what I said. Both Manastone and Sleeper are time limited content. If you are going to accuse players for "loot denial", then you must also accuse dev's for "loot denial". You can't have it both ways. Sleeper is meant to be awoken.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No

Ok so then you're wrong

Got it

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok so then you're wrong

Got it

You clearly cannot refute my point, so you act like a child. If my logic is so fallible, why must you resort to such a childish attempt to "win" the argument?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Nomadic Plainswalker]

Great job all. That was a fun watch.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You clearly cannot refute my point, so you act like a child. If my logic is so fallible, why must you resort to such a childish attempt to "win" the argument?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously guy just give it up

You're wrong

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously guy just give it up

You're wrong

Nope, your lack of argument is not an argument. It's just sad. Clearly your just being stubborn at this point.

[DMN]

Well, congrats, i guess. here is to hoping your badge doesn't become a letter.

I'm sure rogan et al are a little relieved they won't (yet) have to deal with the conundrum of merging servers with different sleeper statuses.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope, your lack of argument is not an argument. It's just sad. Clearly your just being stubborn at this point.

I made my argument like 5 posts ago and you can't refute it

Manastone is dev controlled and it's access is dictated by a timeline. It's a part of the game's history. It was removed because of game mechanics. Not a raid. Players do not control when it drops and when it stops dropping.

Sleeper access is completely controlled by players. Devs will never remove it. Players do.

You're trying to argue apples and oranges

Anyways, it's doesn't matter any more. You're still wrong though.