In case you had any doubt about the Democrat agenda

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're aware it's the lady's wife and the lady herself isn't even associated with the organization anymore?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haha so what?? The woman is really kind of irrelevant anyway. Is BLM giving any of it's millions back to donors? Like what the hell even is it? What do they do? Are they putting their money toward anything that actually helps black people at all, other than buying some of them giant mansions? No? They are a crock of shit organization and even many black people think so. The fact there might be individual local chapters doing good things is great, they should change their names though because I don't associate that type of work with BLM, the brand, at all.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haha so what?? The woman is really kind of irrelevant anyway. Is BLM giving any of it's millions back to donors? Like what the hell even is it? What do they do? Are they putting their money toward anything that actually helps black people at all, other than buying some of them giant mansions? No? They are a crock of shit organization and even many black people think so. The fact there might be individual local chapters doing good things is great, they should change their names though because I don't associate that type of work with BLM, the brand, at all.

Yeah I suppose fairness wouldn't matter to you given your level of bias and animus against the movement. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jibartik]

https://whyy.org/articles/pa-fuel-ta...olice-instead/

Democrat politicians in Pennsylvania diverted $4.2 billion from the gasoline tax that was supposed to go directly to the bridge that fell down and spent that on police instead.

reposting this because you couldnt possibly have a better example as to why we should not be spending 22 trillion on a democrat infrastructure bill THAN THIS

for gods sake people.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah I suppose fairness wouldn't matter to you given your level of bias and animus against the movement. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have no bias against the movement, was a supporter of it becaus the phrase obviously didnt mean all lives didnt matter and black lives DO matter.

The problem is that the dipshits I was standing next to would try to say "its not a big deal" when I was like, this is communist bullshit this isnt about black people.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You see how fear governs them?? lol

Living in fear is just how republicans are. You cant even help it. Your brain is less developed.

lol dude

given how you lefties have embraced covid mass hysteria and commie style mandates across the board, your post is one of the most hilarious self owns I've ever seen on elf forums

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://whyy.org/articles/pa-fuel-ta...olice-instead/

Democrat politicians in Pennsylvania diverted $4.2 billion from the gasoline tax that was supposed to go directly to the bridge that fell down and spent that on police instead.

reposting this because you couldnt possibly have a better example as to why we should not be spending 22 trillion on a democrat infrastructure bill THAN THIS

for gods sake people.

States reappropriate federal funding all the time. See Texas et al and the Medicaid expansion.

[Jibartik]

That is a bad strawman.

Democrats DID reappropriate infrastructure and a bridge collapsed and now they want more for infrastructure.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is a bad strawman.

Democrats DID reappropriate infrastructure and a bridge collapsed and now they want more for infrastructure.

It's just separation of powers and unjusticiable supremacy. Different agendas sure, but same legal mechanisms.

[Jibartik]

Ok now I am becoming a market guy thanks to reiwa.

The market runs a better world is because if the share holders said the CEO was making stupid choices he gets ousted.

But with politics running everything, people will just blindly still support their CEO making bad decisions because it's a team sport, and they'll just let the politicians do whatever because if they were to get upset or call them out about what a bad job theyre doing you think that will elect a guy with leathery wings and fangs and shoots fire from his eyes.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok now I am becoming a market guy thanks to reiwa.

The market runs a better world is because if the share holders said the CEO was making stupid choices he gets ousted.

But with politics running everything, people will just blindly still support their CEO making bad decisions because it's a team sport, and they'll just let the politicians do whatever because if they were to get upset or call them out about what a bad job theyre doing you think that will elect a guy with leathery wings and fangs and shoots fire from his eyes.

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

never trust a man in a bow tie

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]