Court blocks equality law.

[Gravydoo II]

If you dont like it, start your own company. Isnt that how it works? Im sure gap and parlor will over take twitter one of these days. In the mean time, read the TOS. You dont get to do whatever the fuck you want on someone else' platform.

Wow, you registered your name and email, you must own the company now. If one of the rules is "no gun content" or "no trump content" then thats their rules. You dont get to dictate their terms of service you agreed to. You agree to all of them or none of them, thats the point of it.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you dont like it, start your own company. Isnt that how it works? Im sure gap and parlor will over take twitter one of these days. In the mean time, read the TOS. You dont get to do whatever the fuck you want on someone else' platform.

Wow, you registered your name and email, you must own the company now. If one of the rules is "no gun content" or "no trump content" then thats their rules. You dont get to dictate their terms of service you agreed to. You agree to all of them or none of them, thats the point of it.

Thanks for your lawerly expertise but it's almost as if people's entire point here is that these specific companies, the influence they weild, and their ability to legitimately steer elections is extremely new and unprecedented, and may require *updated* or *new* legislation to address these concerns.

You just happen to like the direction the censorship tends to go, so you get all regressive and actually kind of conservative and go "nuh uh, seee, that's the way it goes, that's the law, no updates needed, private company, nahhh nahhh!"

Private companies used to be able to deny people access to their services because they were black. Then that became illegal, because the law was updated.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You just happen to like the direction the censorship tends to go

Are you indicating here that you prefer the lies and misinformation spread by republicans, china, and russia? Do you want twitter to become literal fake news?

Nah, twitter gets the choice to cull problematic users.

Just like you can't scream "FIRE" in a crowded theater, you can't scream "IVERMECTIN CURES COVID" on twitter.

Gtfo of here.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you indicating here that you prefer the lies and misinformation spread by republicans, china, and russia? Do you want twitter to become literal fake news?

Nah, twitter gets the choice to cull problematic users.

Just like you can't scream "FIRE" in a crowded theater, you can't scream "IVERMECTIN CURES COVID" on twitter.

Gtfo of here.

Haha jesus christ, okay adolf whatever you say. I can tell how persuadable you are.

NEIN!!! DASSS IVERMECTEINZ, EIS JUDENREIN!!

(alternative: treat adults as adults, capable of parsing information and determining if it is in fact true, all on their very own! I mean, "women can't have cocks" is a controversial position they *ALSO* consider "dangerous misinformation" btw)

(oh and also nobody was saying ivermectin "cures" covid, if you could be bothered to actually look into it. It is showing promise for certain patients to lessen the severity of certain symptoms, that's all. I agree with you that people claiming it's some miracle drug are kooks, but that doesn't mean there isn't legitimate science being conducted into it's efficacy. Should we not consider every possible option that might help? Why oppose this drug? It's so politically motivated and retarded.)

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Should we not consider every possible option that might help? Why oppose this drug?

Diuretics and laxatives are contraindicated during most illnesses due to the danger of dehydration.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

oh and also nobody was saying ivermectin "cures" covid, if you could be bothered to actually look into it. It is showing promise for certain patients to lessen the severity of certain symptoms, that's all.

No it doesn't. And if you post otherwise, you deserve to have your internet footprint deleted entirely. We don't need those kind of bullshit lies that have already been thoroughly debunked when people are out there dying from covid because they think it's a fix. It's not censorship when it's obvious that you're too stupid not to post literal propaganda that is most likely sponsored by a foreign actor. It's treasonous that you would even repeat it.

And your first amendment rights aren't protected while you're committing treason. Stop it.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you indicating here that you prefer the lies and misinformation spread by republicans, china, and russia? Do you want twitter to become literal fake news?

Nah, twitter gets the choice to cull problematic users.

Just like you can't scream "FIRE" in a crowded theater, you can't scream "IVERMECTIN CURES COVID" on twitter.

Gtfo of here.

Purebloods will inherit The Earth

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thanks for your lawerly expertise but it's almost as if people's entire point here is that these specific companies, the influence they weild, and their ability to legitimately steer elections is extremely new and unprecedented, and may require *updated* or *new* legislation to address these concerns.

You just happen to like the direction the censorship tends to go, so you get all regressive and actually kind of conservative and go "nuh uh, seee, that's the way it goes, that's the law, no updates needed, private company, nahhh nahhh!"

Private companies used to be able to deny people access to their services because they were black. Then that became illegal, because the law was updated.

Maybe stop defunding your schools and you'll stop getting banned. Its more of a read comprehension problem than a left v right problem.

YOU'RE NOT BEING DENIED SERVICE.
Stop making shit up.
You AGREED to their terms.
You cant get banned if you follow the rules.

So if you sew your own mouth shut you can sue a needle and threat company too right? Remember, you're the one who got yourself banned. You have to use the service FIRST before you can be banned. I cant help it if your political party lacks self control, discipline, and the ability to distinguish reality from fiction.


Comparing conservatives posting crazy shit online to the plight of black people in america pre civil rights act is just insane.

You dont have the RIGHT to use someone else' platform to spread your bullshit especially when you agreed in the TOS to not do that.


You can tell they have touched nerves. See how they all flew off the handle? Cause they are banned on social media. lol

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe stop defunding your schools and you'll stop getting banned. Its more of a read comprehension problem than a left v right problem.

YOU'RE NOT BEING DENIED SERVICE.
Stop making shit up.
You AGREED to their terms.
You cant get banned if you follow the rules.

So if you sew your own mouth shut you can sue a needle and threat company too right? Remember, you're the one who got yourself banned. You have to use the service FIRST before you can be banned. I cant help it if your political party lacks self control, discipline, and the ability to distinguish reality from fiction.


Comparing conservatives posting crazy shit online to the plight of black people in america pre civil rights act is just insane.

You dont have the RIGHT to use someone else' platform to spread your bullshit especially when you agreed in the TOS to not do that.


You can tell they have touched nerves. See how they all flew off the handle? Cause they are banned on social media. lol

I like the part where this section 230 bullcrap got dunked on and lost in Alito's home circuit and they come here acting like we're the unreasonable maniacs.

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like the part where this section 230 bullcrap got dunked on and lost in Alito's home circuit and they come here acting like we're the unreasonable maniacs.

Thats what the lawyer kept saying! lol 230 230! omg 230! The judge is like "dude, not our fault they get themselves banned for believing and spreading bullshit and they happen to be conservatives most of the time."

Lol since conspiracy, fake news, death threats, hate groups, and swindlers are almost always right wingers, they want that to be our fault.

We get it. They just want a safe space to post anything they want to anyone they want without any repercussions. If you or I post something they dont like, report report report!! Send death threats!! Dox em!!

Ive always known they wanted a two tier legal system but I didnt think they would have said it so blatantly.