Human Brain Computer

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah that's a double-bagger.

i wonder if the entire experiment is contaminated by forbidding, "would you do her" and including a diverse sample set of all genders/sexual orientations.

This is really very simple for straight men: "I'd hit it"

is one able to offer an objective opinion of a woman's looks if they are not wired to be attracted to women?

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Horny males will likely fuck almost anything even if their brains are simplified computer models of the outputs of real horny male brains.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Horny males will likely fuck almost anything even if their brains are simplified computer models of the outputs of real horny male brains.

Even more questions now

are we rating her looks as if she were a flower in a meadow? or a woman in the red light district?

Kevin was right, "a painting can be beautiful, but i don't wanna bang a painting"

as far as humans rating other human's looks, the entire mechanism is designed to make males and females pair off and procreate.

Given Swank's definite physical health and prowess as a potential female breeding candidate, then the answer to this question across the board of breeding age human males is unequivocally:

"I'd Hit That"

[starkind]

It would no longer be objective for that particular subset of the population. Horny straight males.

I suppose some women want to fuck so that leaves the answer as "generally yes". If ape and horniness = tru.

Also SJP is prolly 5'3'' & "female".

[starkind]

Hot implies lustiness in the loins.

I'm personally nonplussed either way.

No desire to fuck. Or pretend to be inseminated. Wouldn't look away or be creeped out. Probably would allow her to fuck me or make an effort out of generosity, not that she needs it. If we were hanging out in a garden I'd probably spend most of my time looking at the horizon or sky. She's not repulsive.

Answer still stands in my individual case. Not hot. Moderately attractive. Not ugly. I'd be happy and not dysphoric if I looked like her, had her body.

Hot doesn't equate to attractiveness. However there is some overlap at the more attractive/ hot side of the spectrum. She's really not in either, just about maybe.

[Trexller]

"I'd hit that" is absolutely an objective answer, if the intent of rating "Hot or Not" is an attempt at assigning a value to the sex appeal rating of this woman.

Apes and horniness definitely = true, and should be the determining factor, as "sex appeal" is well, self explanatory and evolved to make the strongest mates stand out from the crowd of other less sexy (genetically inferior) apes.

If the question were: "Is Hilary Swank pretty like a flower"

The same opinion samples would reply, "nah bro"

[starkind]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You fed the punchcards into the machine. It printed it's output, tickertape. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hot implies lustiness in the loins.

Yes, exactly.

Therefore i will reinforce again that the solution to this equation is:

Body: Yes!
Face: Nah, bro

=

Hot Butterface

[starkind]

Just close your eyes. I used to during sex all the time. Nothing wrong with it.

[Trexller]

uhhh

So whalebiologist's cartoon is a rather profound statement about humanity's pursuit of understanding