The Resist System Balance Thread

[Foxx]

for level 60 pvp lures were rarely used in kunark, only when fighting the TOP geared players (only a handful of people, seriously prob less than 10), but were basically the only dd spells used in velious era pvp for wizards

edit: or if they hard a bard in group, or raid buffed with GMR and circles etc

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Foxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

for level 60 pvp lures were rarely used in kunark, only when fighting the TOP geared players (only a handful of people, seriously prob less than 10), but were basically the only dd spells used in velious era pvp for wizards

Nobody landed shit on me with just 120mr and 120FR during Kunark and Velious. That's why it's hilarious how people were trying to claim what I posted on the first page is somehow a "nerf" for casters. I'll go ahead and lower resists even more just so I don't have to listen to all the Macken whines.

[Koota]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nobody landed shit on me with just 120mr and 120FR during Kunark and Velious. That's why it's hilarious how people were trying to claim what I posted on the first page is somehow a "nerf" for casters. I'll go ahead and lower resists even more just so I don't have to listen to all the Macken whines.

So now you were 100% resistant with 120 MR and 120 FR? I don't think anyone will even need proof to know that you're way wrong here, too.

[Foxx]

i never played a wizard in pvp until luclin and my friend gave me his wizard to manaburn people with to farm plat, so technically i never did play a wizard in real pvp

I played a cleric in that era, and i know my offensive spells were basically useless except against the noobies at 60 who still used plane gear to hide droppable stuff

I always had some of the better gear available, and always wore my droppable stuff so I do remember what landed and what didnt.

druids ALWAYS landed there dot line spells on me, it seriously seemed like they were unresistable. they couldnt do much in the way of nuking tho, i rarely resisted there 51+ nuke but it was always for really small damage

shamans landed bane of knife easily same with E bolt, but that 60 disease one not so much.

necro always landed splurt, literally always... Never landed darkness, never root, but did use E bolt along with the 50s line for heat blood (i forget which one it is). I cant remember if it was a luclin spell or not, but i remember pyrocruour was nasty as hell too and uber hard to resist

enchanters -- they were always hard to play, tash was almost no mana, fast cast, and rapture was unresistable. they could land stuns and dots on me fairly easily with tash

wizards -- it wasnt until velious where they started to stick purely to lure spells in pvp

mages -- idk they suck, epic was stupid good tho

myself, as a cleric -- nothing, if target was tashed or malod, i could use stuns but other than that prob not

[Koota]

Originally Posted by Foxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

druids ALWAYS landed there dot line spells on me, it seriously seemed like they were unresistable. they couldnt do much in the way of nuking tho, i rarely resisted there 51+ nuke but it was always for really small damage

shamans landed bane of knife easily same with E bolt, but that 60 disease one not so much.

necro always landed splurt, literally always... Never landed darkness, never root, but did use E bolt along with the 50s line for heat blood (i forget which one it is). I cant remember if it was a luclin spell or not, but i remember pyrocruour was nasty as hell too and uber hard to resist

enchanters -- they were always hard to play, tash was almost no mana, fast cast, and rapture was unresistable. they could land stuns and dots on me fairly easily with tash

wizards -- it wasnt until velious where they started to stick purely to lure spells in pvp

mages -- idk they suck, epic was stupid good tho

myself, as a cleric -- nothing, if target was tashed or malod, i could use stuns but other than that prob not

this ^

[Alcandre]

why do you keep talking about kunark and velious? you wont have either when the server opens. and there was no los check at the end of casting

[Knuckle]

It's hilarious how you keep trying to claim I'm a terrible player in every post, yet when you send one of the best players from your guild to fight me in ranger best of the best....he loses, even with better gear.



LOL ranger best of the best = searyx randomly summoning me while im drunk as fuck to the arena.

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Knuckle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOL ranger best of the best = searyx randomly summoning me while im drunk as fuck to the arena.

I had just lost both arms while lion hunting

[Macken]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Macken you just proved how much of a giant idiot you are. Why do you think people ducked behind walls to avoid having spells land on them on EQ live? If there weren't 2 line of sight checks, ducking behind walls wouldn't cause the spells to fail but the spells did fail when you ran behind them.

This is just like the time on TZVZ boards how there were a couple morons saying you needed 200MR to resist roots during Kunark and Velious. Yet in this screenshot, you have crazycloud (one of the best players on SZ), plus Vernal (original FoH member), plus a 1999 RZ player and a TZ player, and me, all saying the exact opposite.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I enjoy that you are trying, but it ain't gonna happen bro, we are going to continue to prove you wrong while making fun of you. Shody just confirmed it on his live server too , I've confirmed it on SZ.

Mage bolts don't count. I didn't think anyone who knows what we are talking about would even think that we were only talking about mage bolts.

You lose. AGAIN

I don't see anyone anywhere on your screen captures saying they resisted spells 100% of the time with 100 mr. Even the guys you offer up as people who corroborate your insane claims refute your assertation that you can get 100% resistant to magic with 100mr. CrazyC even goes so far as to say he got snared with 100 mr in your own screenshot. Have you no common sense man?

No one in those SS's even mention 200mr, just you. Not sure what you are hallucinationing or imagining, but no one is agreeing with your claims about 100% resists, only somewhat absract comments about it being easier to resist things once you get 100 mr. I guess for you that = you are right? LOL

You have FAILED again.

[Macken]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here's another idiot that never played EQ live PvP during kunark or velious. If I went AFK for 30 minutes, a wizard probably wouldn't be able to kill me without using lures during this era.

And this is your arguement that casters need to be nerfed further?