Incel

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

my pikachu is the strongest

Right on bruh. This is precisely why everything is viewed purely though the sexual lens for you. When you deny the immaterial, all that remains is the material, and thus it all desce lnds to the root of the material; physicality.

By all means, carry on kicking and screaming about the world not being what you "think" it "should" be. Im sure the nature of the universe is going to up and change, just because you willed it to, without any action whatsoever.

*eyeroll*

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Right on bruh. This is precisely why everything is viewed purely though the sexual lens for you. When you deny the immaterial, all that remains is the material, and thus it all desce lnds to the root of the material; physicality.

By all means, carry on kicking and screaming about the world not being what you "think" it "should" be. Im sure the nature of the universe is going to up and change, just because you willed it to, without any action whatsoever.

*eyeroll*

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Throndor]

Do you care to debate? I believe i have positted 3 questiond for you marxists to resolve before this discussion can continue. Im waiting.

[misterbonkers]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you care to debate? I believe i have positted 3 questiond for you marxists to resolve before this discussion can continue. Im waiting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4pxtiLR928

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4pxtiLR928

Nice sidebust. But i believe the first question is directed at Dictum; who is making the claim that women want to fuck the top 20% because of capitalism.

If its because of capitalism, then how did the anomaly exist before capitalism, even in societies that were inherently communal?

[Throndor]

J, we're in agreement, at least causually, dont answer the question for them.

How did native american cultures have a disparity in some tribesmen having multiple wives, and others having to accept a relegated role of transvestism if women gravitating toward the men demonstrating social and or physical apex characteristics is a product of capitalist society?

Capitalism was a completely foreign concept to these almost entirely communal tribes. How does marxist theory account for this anomaly?

In response to your last sentence, J, what makes you think true Artificial Intelligence would side with Marxist theory? The theory, itself, is absolutely riddled with contradictions.

How would the AI establish "equality" when some people are more compulsive and wasteful than others? Why would AI side with the more wasteful, compulsive sects? That would go against the efficiency imperative, would it not?

It seems to me, anyone claiming to be a Marxist AND a critical thinker, must abandon Marxist theory, because it fails the critical analysis all over the place. So much for the smart ones, angle. I think it more aptly fits the "retarded ones" angle, with "smart ones" lumped into it merely as a means of undeservedly taking from others what they've failed to earn for themselves (be it POWER, MONEY, or Social Prestige).

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Marxist drivel.

Please explain, how in native american communal societies, devoid of complex heirarchies and money systems, women still gravitated towards wanting to fuck the most physically assertive and or socially powerful men?

Explain to me how a system "devoid of Heirarchies" still favors men on top of the heirarchy eh?

In nature. The bigger, stronger and scarier men are the naturally dominate force. However, that is a brutal world that doesn't last long, because all men get old. So they usually set up some kind of social heirarchy that favors old men rather than young men.

So tribal cultures are usually what we call "chiefdoms" where a patriarchial leader usually runs things.

Native Americans didn't think men should farm. So the wealth was kept with women. Women preferred big strong sexy guys that were good at hunting/fighting and other men were impressed with/scared of. For a similar reason that guys like nice asses. And just like today, people do a lot of compromising in the real world.

This is also how it worked in Europe for awhile (besides maybe the females doing the farming bit). Then it evolved into Feudalism -- some of those chiefs inevitably become kings that set up a system of nobels to maintain control over an expanding kingdom...eventually empire in some cases.

Then Capitalism came along and marketed to women how nice it is to have modern gadgets and comforts purchased for you by men.

Men that can do this for women at a high rate are the top 20%

Throndor thinks hes full of useful advice on how to get up to the top 20%...and doesn't completely seem to realize that's not what were talking about.

But that's common for conservatives when confronted with how poor their ideas have performed since Reagan.

[Nexii]

Ya'll think too much. Just get the best mate you can and settle for nothing less.

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Explain to me how a system "devoid of Heirarchies" still favors men on top of the heirarchy eh?

In nature. The bigger, stronger and scarier men are the naturally dominate force. However, that is a brutal world that doesn't last long, because all men get old. So they usually set up some kind of social heirarchy that favors old men rather than young men.

So tribal cultures are usually what we call "chiefdoms" where a patriarchial leader usually runs things.

Native Americans didn't think men should farm. So the wealth was kept with women. Women preferred big strong sexy guys that were good at hunting/fighting and other men were impressed with/scared of. For a similar reason that guys like nice asses. And just like today, people do a lot of compromising in the real world.

This is also how it worked in Europe for awhile (besides maybe the females doing the farming bit). Then it evolved into Feudalism -- some of those chiefs inevitably become kings that set up a system of nobels to maintain control over an expanding kingdom...eventually empire in some cases.

Then Capitalism came along and marketed to women how nice it is to have modern gadgets and comforts purchased for you by men.

Men that can do this for women at a high rate are the top 20%

Throndor thinks hes full of useful advice on how to get up to the top 20%...and doesn't completely seem to realize that's not what were talking about.

But that's common for conservatives when confronted with how poor their ideas have performed since Reagan.

You're moving the goalposts.

In your prior post, you placed the blame squarely on the shoulders of "Capitalism" you cannot transmute this statement to mean "all non communism isms". That is the definition of moving the goalposts. Please stay within the confines of your own assertions.

Now, if there is 100$, and we split it equitably at 50$ each.....you're compulsive and wasteful and you blow your money 30 seconds later, whilst I am disciplined and minimalist and only use my money for sustenance leaving me 45$ at the end of the day, how can we be "equal" tomorrow? Do we need to split it in half again since there's technically no "difference" between us and the equation must always be balanced?

[ScaringChildren]

it's a fuck or be fucked world out there...

that's why I go on the offensive and use as many bodies as my dirty cum rags as possible