Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Do you think this is a good idea?
Yes 61 54.46%
No, I like 3x more zones than players 51 45.54%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-08-2017, 11:33 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,044
Default

There is nothing better than the rush you get from your first legit pvp kill 1v1, sad that a lot of people will never try it to see what I mean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #32  
Old 03-08-2017, 11:48 PM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,814
Default

I think the poll has the right idea; that there are too many zones relative to players.

Norrath is just too big on red.

I'd like to see a vanilla red with no expansions. That massively reduces the fungi twink problem too. In fact I'd even be happy with lvl 40 cap, Faydwer only (talls vs shorts?!).

The only problem is that would either require a significant roll back or full wipe, which would essentially mean killing, not saving, red.
  #33  
Old 03-09-2017, 12:19 AM
Teako Teako is offline
Sarnak

Teako's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd like to see a vanilla red with no expansions.
I'd like to see Red deleted, or at very least Red recruitment spam silenced.

Can't always get what we want.
  #34  
Old 03-09-2017, 12:22 AM
Squire Squire is offline
Fire Giant

Squire's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teako [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd like to see Red deleted, or at very least Red recruitment spam silenced.

Can't always get what we want.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good constructive commentary.
  #35  
Old 03-09-2017, 12:53 AM
Ivah Ivah is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 194
Default

Server is fine stay on blue and wait in your dumb ass lines while constantly bitching that you have no alterative k thx.
  #36  
Old 05-18-2017, 05:12 PM
Topgunben Topgunben is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topgunben [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I know how to save Red. Allow characters to be copied from blue to red, so the character can still be played on BLUE.

this could breathe much needed life into Red, and make the server an option again.
I posted this a couple months ago hoping to see some kind of change in Red. The fact that 60 nerds have a whole server dedicated to them is mind boggling. Something needs to change, this is pure insanity.

My questions to the devs is "are you satisfied with the population of Red?"
  #37  
Old 05-18-2017, 05:34 PM
Squabbles123 Squabbles123 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 156
Default

The only PvP server I would play on again in EQ is a team PvP server.

Team PvP was pretty cool on live, it didn't last long, but the concept of "controlling territory" was very fun.
  #38  
Old 05-18-2017, 10:59 PM
Salaryman Salaryman is offline
Fire Giant

Salaryman's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 726
Default

i had a good time on red with my mighty paladin. i managed to get the nerds to give me raid loot even though i contributed nothing to the guild and was afk for all raids i obtained the strongest pvp items such as

pauldrons of ferocity,
tri plated golden hackle hammer,
sword of rile,
aon,
paladious axe of and 8 other vulak items,
a second aon
shield of rainbow hues
robe of azure sky
shield of immaculate


then stole a manastone and kept it i have the strongest paladin.
dont play eq
  #39  
Old 05-19-2017, 12:27 AM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

not reading thread but anyohne who doesnt agree with OP is a toolbag
  #40  
Old 05-19-2017, 01:46 AM
Debaser8 Debaser8 is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 15
Default

You could make most old world zones and some Kunark zones subject to a rule where anybody who attacks somebody else in PVP vulnerable to players of all levels for 2 hours in game(and also people who attack them are still only vulnerable to +-4). This might cut down on twinked griefers, or at least make it more risky.

Also, why was spell resistance change from 5% to 2% at max? This only makes geared players stronger and discourages new, ungeared, players from joining the server. I know this a marginal change, but it seems weird. And, why don't lower level spells become less resistable like they were on live. It was nice to be able to interrupt people with Chaotic Feedback or SoL.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.