![]() |
#31
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#33
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
#34
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Yeah I typed it in the topic, but the context of my posts are on a possible brown dwarf, which may show you are just posting and not reading. A planet wouldn't be out-gassing helium into the solar system which is what has caught my interest in recent months, and odd solar winds. Not saying there couldn't be a planet X, but all that 2012 stuff had to do with the end of the Mayan calendar and "Nibiru" because they added them together as some sort of cataclysmic end of world sign. They were wrong, as I knew they would be. World isn't ending, dude. Weird asses stuff about Nibiru, ancient legends it's the coming of the cataclysm and the dawn of the new age/awakening type junk. That the planet is populated by those demigods from the precursor to the Egyptian Pharaohs etc etc. That's why you gotta be careful when looking at these Nibiru sites, they wanna turn you into priests for their human sacrifices one day, or just sacrifice you heh. Nope, purely scientific exploration here. And pretty cool Trump just mentioned today he's going to reform NASA, put them back on track to being an actual space agency again. If he can clean that shit up, we might actually get something done, then quit relying on others for... about everything.
__________________
| |||
|
#35
|
|||
|
![]() Dawning of the age of Aquarious, spooky shit or nothing?
__________________
![]() | ||
|
#36
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
The meaning of Aquarius is that when that constellation moved into the appropriate position on the zodiac, it would begin the promised utopia. It may be "new age", but it's not new. It just means the coming age or next age. The belief spans back through history, through the cultures and empires, come and gone.
__________________
| |||
|
#37
|
|||
|
![]() Forced tangent into astrology. All too easy.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
#38
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
The issue is that the mathematical evidence shows an object around 10 earth masses affecting the orbits of Keiper belt objects. That's hundreds, if not thousands of times less mass than would be needed for a brown dwarf. If something that massive were part of our solar system and still undiscovered, there would be much more significant unexplained variance in the known planetary and Keiper belt orbits. As for that youtube video, I don't know who that guy is or what his data sources are. As to the earth passing through hydrogen and helium clouds... well, space is not empty, and our solar system is not stationary. I'd imagine the planet passes through stellar clouds on a regular basis, and we don't usually even notice, because it's not a noteworthy event.
__________________
[60 High Priest] Eadric
| |||
|
#39
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#40
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Gnawlunzs Phrogphry
Master Angler, Baker, Cadger, Drunk "If you can't eat a frog, then eat two." | |||
|
![]() |
|
|