BLM Terrorist Charged With Felony Lynching

[Blitzers]

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Margaret Sanger founder of Planned Parenthood


“It was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously. Her courage, her tenacity, her vision … When I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I’m really in awe of her. There are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life, from the causes she launched and fought for and scarified for so greatly.”

Hillary Clinton founder of Lies

[maskedmelon]

I'm not sure I would really want word to go out that I want to exterminate the negro population either. Maybe we should do a poll?


That aside, Margaret Sanger was an ugly racist feminist prude.

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not sure I would really want word to go out that I want to exterminate the negro population either. Maybe we should do a poll?


That aside, Margaret Sanger was an ugly racist feminist prude.

But, but, Hillary loves her.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mentions facts and then post none. Ive only seen you copy paste some definitions. Where are all these facts you keep talking about? Did you sell them with some of your virtual goods?

My facts got deleted once a thread was deleted. The burden of proof is on the person making assertions. Do you even logic?(Its a rhetorical question I know you don't)

Originally Posted by barrettdc1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are arguing with a guy who has the biggest libcuck, George Clooney, as his avatar. That right off the bat should raise a red flag that you are wasting your breath. George Clooney is a fucking tard.

He is also an actor and is a remnant from when alot of TMO members put Oceans 11 characters in their avatars. I don't support Clooney's politics. Sorry if its hard for you to separate two distinct concepts.

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And lives in shitattle.

I used to live in Florida.. it didn't make me a conservative. I used to live in Mississippi It didn't make me a conservative. Also, Seattle is awesome, have you ever been?

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My facts got deleted once a thread was deleted. The burden of proof is on the person making assertions. Do you even logic?(Its a rhetorical question I know you don't)



He is also an actor and is a remnant from when alot of TMO members put Oceans 11 characters in their avatars. I don't support Clooney's politics. Sorry if its hard for you to separate two distinct concepts.



I used to live in Florida.. it didn't make me a conservative. I used to live in Mississippi It didn't make me a conservative. Also, Seattle is awesome, have you ever been?

I saw your deleted comments. There were no facts there you don't even source your information. Do you even debate bro? Also you made the claim that Daywolf was wrong yet you supplied no evidence just your word. The burden of proof would then be on you. You know to back up your claim that he is wrong and that the democrats after 100 years of oppressing minorities suddenly did a magic flip. The magic flip is your claim so supply some proof.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's like the general p99 shitposter isn't aware of the southern democrat vote shift. This goes back to that other thread where people whined about semantics Party doesn't equal ideology.

How do you explain the above. Party doesn't equal ideology? We arent talking about some Gatsby party but political parties you know with political ideologies. Seriously that is one of the most ignorant statements I've heard and you keep repeating it as if its gospel.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How do you explain the above. Party doesn't equal ideology? We arent talking about some Gatsby party but political parties you know with political ideologies. Seriously that is one of the most ignorant statements I've heard and you keep repeating it as if its gospel.

Gospel is a bad description since there is no evidence that god or any religion is real.

I repeat it as if its fact.... because it is fact.

Democratic party doesn't mean anything the issues the political party support have changed over time. It's fact. Being Liberal has nothing to do with being a Democrat just like being Conservative has nothing to do with being a Republican. It's fact.

If you choose not to accept it that is of little concern to me.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gospel is a bad description since there is no evidence that god or any religion is real.

I repeat it as if its fact.... because it is fact.

Democratic party doesn't mean anything the issues the political party support have changed over time. It's fact. Being Liberal has nothing to do with being a Democrat just like being Conservative has nothing to do with being a Republican. It's fact.

If you choose not to accept it that is of little concern to me.

That was quite a gracious tail tucking. So in other words come in thread scream about proof then provide none. Get mad when called out and tell people its not your concern. See ya pal.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I saw your deleted comments. There were no facts there you don't even source your information. Do you even debate bro? Also you made the claim that Daywolf was wrong yet you supplied no evidence just your word. The burden of proof would then be on you. You know to back up your claim that he is wrong and that the democrats after 100 years of oppressing minorities suddenly did a magic flip. The magic flip is your claim so supply some proof.

Information was source and the information was factual. Even if you stamp your feet really loud!.

Who said the Parties has a magic flip? It was a political realignment that happened over several decades.

1896: William Jennings Bryan integrated the Populist party into the democratic party. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People...United_States)
The populist party was left-wing so the Democratic party which was then very right-wing picked up some lefties.

1912: Teddy Roosevelt lost the nomination of the Republican Party which was more left-wing (and mostly a reintegration of the old Whig party) at the time so he ran for president under the Progressive Party. Which weakens the loyalty of liberal republicans to their party.

1932: FDR runs as a democrat after adopting most of the Progressive party's platform.
Southern whites have supported the democratic party since the Civil War.

1964: LBJ Incorporates civil rights as a democratic party platform. Effectively switching the southern white vote in the future to the Republican party. You'll notice people likw George Wallace a long time segregationist running as an independent in '68. Then renouncing segregation to rejoin the democratic part later on. Many liberal politicians also switched from the Republican tickets to the democratic ticket in future elections.

Republicans used to be about big government, government responsibility to social programs etc. Democrats were conservatives, states rights, limited government.

There were still liberals identifying as repubs and conservatives identifying as democrats but they were minorities...until around 2000.

Ideology switched.


Sources for you Santa even though I know you won't read them. It's easier to just deny right?

Byron E. Shafer and Richard Johnston, The End of Southern Exceptionalism: Class, Race, and Partisan Change in the Postwar South (2009) p 173-4

K.C. MacKay, The Progressive Movement of 1924. New York: Columbia University Press, 1947.

Hart, Jeffrey (2006-02-09). The Making of the American Conservative Mind (television). Hanover, New Hampshire: C-SPAN.

Roger Chapman, Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia (2010) vol 1 Page 136

Alabama Governor George Wallace, gubernatorial history". Archives.state.al.us.

Carter, Dan T. (1995). The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 468.

McMillan, Joseph (October 1, 2010), Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 26th and 32nd Presidents of the United States, American Heraldry Society
Jump up ^ Morris 1979, p. 3.

Hart, Albert B.; Ferleger, Herbert R (1989). "Theodore Roosevelt Cyclopedia" (CD-ROM). Theodore Roosevelt Association. pp. 534–35.

https://books.google.com/books?id=bJ...page&q&f=false


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Society

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigr...ty_Act_of_1965

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was quite a gracious tail tucking. So in other words come in thread scream about proof then provide none. Get mad when called out and tell people its not your concern. See ya pal.

You required proof. I provided... now its your turn or Daywolf. I expect to receive nothing from you though. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quick think of some names to call me while you spin to some other off the wall topic.